Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 169405
| Summary: | Review Request: regexxer - A nifty GUI search/replace tool | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christoph Wickert <cwickert> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Aurelien Bompard <gauret> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://regexxer.sourceforge.net/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-09-30 13:40:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Christoph Wickert
2005-09-27 21:52:48 UTC
Review for release 1.fc4: * RPM name is OK * Source regexxer-0.8.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of regexxer looks OK * File list of regexxer looks OK * Works fine Minor: * Requires: gconfmm26 is useless, rpm will pick it up automatically : $ rpm -qpR regexxer-0.8-1.fc4.i386.rpm | grep gconf gconfmm26 >= 2.6.1 libgconf-2.so.4 libgconfmm-2.6.so.1 * Duplicate BuildRequires: gtkmm24-devel (required by libglademm24-devel) Please remove the hardcoded dependency on gconfmm26, and consider yourself APPROVED (do as you wish with the duplicate BR, its really minor) Christoph, if you do changes (like the ones suggested by Aurelien in #1 that you did to the regexxer.spec between review and cvs-import) you also should describe those in the changelog and increase the release. And IMHO the imported package also should always be exatly the one that was reviewed. Additional changes like those suggest in #1 should be done directly after import. tia Updated to release -2 with complete changelog info. Arrived at FE servers yesterday. |