Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1703083
Summary: | /dev filesystem gets no selinux label on FC30 dist-upgrades on Raspberry Pi3 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | chotaire+fedora |
Component: | fedora-arm-installer | Assignee: | Paul Whalen <pwhalen> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 30 | CC: | jonc_mailbox, oliver, pbrobinson, pwhalen, rebus |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | armv7hl | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-04-25 17:32:04 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
chotaire+fedora
2019-04-25 13:27:53 UTC
So a number of things here: 1) a dist upgrade is completely unrelated to arm-image-installer. 2) which process did you use to "dist-upgrade"? 3) You'd be better off doing a complete relabel if you see issues with SELinux by doing the following: "touch /.autorelabel; reboot" Pity that this one is closed as NOTABUG. I believe it is one - seems that dist upgrading from some previous versions of fedora results in some mountpoints being mislabeled, which is now set as issue in Fedora 30. It seems to affect the mountpoints, which are normally mounted during boot, so things like "touch /.autorelabel; reboot" or "fixfiles onboot" wont help. See other related bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706451 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708991 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663040 (In reply to Michal Ambroz from comment #2) > Pity that this one is closed as NOTABUG. I believe it is one - seems that It's unrelated to arm-image-installer, and hence isn't a bug in the component you've filed it under. > See other related bugs: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706451 This is a bug against selinux-policy-targeted (probably the right component for you to file a bug) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708991 This is against snapd which is a containerisation technology. Not sure how that relates to /dev/ issues on upgrade > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663040 And lorax is a component used as part of the compose process making in the installer. The bug should probably be filed against the dist-upgrade component, or possibly selinux-policy-targeted, and it should be nothing to do specifically with the Raspberry Pi as we handle all HW the same in that regard. |