Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 172062
Summary: | RFE: update libgsf to 1.13.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michael Wise <micwise> |
Component: | libgsf | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hdegoede |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.13.3-1 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-01 09:16:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michael Wise
2005-10-30 11:39:42 UTC
Well the 1.13 series is technically "unstable", and I don't want to get into supporting an unstable version. 1.12-3 was only released in september. I'm reluctant to move to 1.13. I would like to add a me too or +1 to this ticket, I would like to update gnumeric in extras to 1.6 which needs libgoffice-0.1.x which needs libgsf >= 1.13.2 . Please reconcider. As an alternative I might create a libgsf13 package, whot is you opinion on that? I'm not in favour of putting in a 1.13 under-development package until it's 1.14 as I don't need the pain of api changes right now for libwpd->OOo and whatever else is lurking in the grass. A libgsf13 package sounds good In the meantime I've made a special libgsf113 package for extras which can be installed next to the core libgsf without any problems. See bug 174266 for the extras review. I've also created a goffice package for extras, see Bug 174267 for the review. hmm, one of my more gung-ho co-workers has upgraded it anyway :-) Hmm, Could you add an Obsoletes libgsf113(-devel) to it so that it get rids of libgsf113, this doesn't conflict but ldd on something linked to libgsf might get the extra versions as that adds /usr/lib(64)/libgsf-1.13/lib to the ldpath. I'll update goffice and gnumeric to build against the new in core package (not set a special PKGCONFIG path and change requires). Thanks, Hans ok, done. |