Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 172527
Summary: | Review Request: python-astng | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | José Matos <jamatos> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.logilab.org/projects/astng | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-12 18:36:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Konstantin Ryabitsev
2005-11-06 06:20:17 UTC
Updated to version 0.13.1 released today. http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/python-astng.spec http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/python-astng-0.13.1-0.1.src.rpm Is this line really required? Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") I thought it was unnecessary for FC4+ Other than that it looks OK, I am building it using mock, and if all goes as I expect I will approve it soon. :-) OK, ignore my comment, I just saw that line in fedora-rpmdevtools rpm. Review: + it build in mock on x86_64 + it carries the license, the license is correct (GPL) and valid for Extras + the source file is the same as upstream + the rpm follows the packaging guides + the rpm follows the packaging name rules + rpmlint does not have any output in any of the generated rpms + the spec file is readable and it is written in American English + the package carries code not contents Approved. Thank you, kind sir -- it will be imported shortly. :) |