Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 173661
Summary: | Review Request: xfce4-fsguard-plugin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christoph Wickert <cwickert> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-01-26 14:01:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Christoph Wickert
2005-11-18 20:33:05 UTC
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-fsguard-plugin-0.2.1-2.fc4.src.rpm Spec is good. Mock succesfully built from SRPMS, rpmlint passed. Set to FE-ACCEPT. Congragulation. More detailed review: + mock succesfully build the package without noticeable error + rpmlint did not report any error nor warning + tarball from SRPM matched source tarball for URL listed on SPEC file through md5 and sha1 + binary package installed and removed without noticeable issue + name of the package/SPEC files follow PackagingGuide and PackageNameGuideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines + License listed on SPEC file matched the license in the tarball and it is GPL-compatible http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses Accordingly, the package is ready to be included on Fedora Extras. Build on all targets succeeded. CLOSED. |