Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1741699
Summary: | Build wxGTK 3.0 for EPEL8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
Component: | wxGTK3 | Assignee: | Scott Talbert <swt> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel8 | CC: | alexjnewt, c72578, germano.massullo, philip.wyett, swt |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-09-02 01:19:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Orion Poplawski
2019-08-15 20:58:46 UTC
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #0) > Let's get wxGTK 3.0.X into EPEL8. I would suggest creating a new wxGTK3.0 > package to allow for packaging multiple versions considering the long > lifespan of RHEL8. This can be done without a full package review via the > exception process. Unless you feel strongly about it, I'm inclined to use the existing wxGTK3 name since that's what people are used to on Fedora and the other EPEL's. IF we ever do a renaming in Fedora, I'd say we can do the same in EL too. > Unfortunately RHEL8.0 is not providing various GUI libraries (namely > webkit2gtk3-devel) on aarch64 and s390x so we will need to ExcludeArch those. Thanks for the heads-up on that. I really don't have a strong preference, but I think it gives you a lot more flexibility. It can always "Provide: wxGTK3" for compatibility. It's your package though, you can decide. But 10 years is a long time :). *** Bug 1741915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a44a523f63 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a44a523f63 wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a44a523f63 Package is -10.el8.1' when really should be '-10.1.el8' '.1' wrong side of dust tag? (In reply to Phil Wyett from comment #6) > Package is -10.el8.1' when really should be '-10.1.el8' '.1' wrong side of > dust tag? I just did it that way because it seemed that's what Smooge was doing with all the other epel8 packages. I suppose it is per this policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_you_need_to_change_an_old_branch_without_rebuilding_the_others But it probably isn't necessary, since there is no upgrade path from Fedora's to EL. wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |