Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 174504

Summary: Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Linus Walleij <triad>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-extras-list
Target Milestone: ---Flags: kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.winehq.org
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-10-31 22:10:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Andreas Bierfert 2005-11-29 16:16:58 UTC
Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs-0.9.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
This package is Wine's documentation repository. It consists of 
various guides and their translations.

Comment 5 Linus Walleij 2006-01-13 22:10:22 UTC
Lint results:

# rpmlint wine-docs-0.9.5-1.src.rpm
E: wine-docs configure-without-libdir-spec
- could be ignored, nothing libbed here.

# rpmlint wine-docs-0.9.5-1.noarch.rpm
W: wine-docs no-version-in-last-changelog

That thing again. Not much to care about here.

Docs are placed in /usr/share/doc/wine-docs-0.9.5, perhaps
one would prefer /usr/share/doc/wine-0.9.5 but who cares.

GOOD:
* Package name matches spec file name
* Meets package naming guidelines (child package docs)
* FLOSS-compatible license (LGPL)
* spec file is in american english
* spec file is readable indeed
* sources match upstream (MD5SUM is the same)
* builds fine on FC4
* no exceptionized BuildRequires
* all build dependencies listed
* no locale magic needed
* no libraries installed
* non-relocatable
* owns its directories (implicit since %doc tag is used)
* no duplicate files
* proper permissions on files
* proper %clean section
* proper use of macros I think, should %configure be used instead of ./configure?

NEEDSWORK:
* License field is wrong: tagged GPL but is LGPL (COPYING.LIB)
* The license file MUST be %doc:ed

Fix these and it's a go...

Comment 6 Andreas Bierfert 2006-01-13 23:54:44 UTC
Fixed the NEEDSWORK things...

as to configure: If I remeber correctly it failed with %configure ...

Here you go and thanks for your time :)
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs.spec
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs-0.9.5-2.src.rpm

Comment 7 Linus Walleij 2006-01-14 07:51:08 UTC
APPROVED.

Comment 8 Andreas Bierfert 2006-01-14 08:40:40 UTC
Thanks again :) build for fc5.

Comment 9 Andreas Bierfert 2007-04-27 23:12:49 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: wine-docs
New Branches: EL-5

Comment 10 Andreas Bierfert 2007-10-30 07:05:16 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: wine-docs
New Branches: EL-4

Comment 11 Kevin Fenzi 2007-10-30 16:29:45 UTC
cvs done.