Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 175623
Summary: | Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, i, j |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | i:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-07 21:50:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Konstantin Ryabitsev
2005-12-13 14:47:15 UTC
Build failed, devel x86_64 checking for working tcpd.h... no configure: error: tcpd development libraries missing Adding back my comment that was lost in the crash: ------- Additional Comments From tibbs.edu 2006-06-10 16:44 EST ------- icon, are you still interested in packaging this? I have to say, the description is terribly non-descriptive. Even the upstream website doesn't fother to say what Z39.50 is. Perhaps adding the following (cribbed from wikipedia) would help a bit: Z39.50 is a client server protocol for searching and retrieving information from remote computer databases. This does, however, properly build in mock (x86_64, development). If icon is still interested and updates to the current version (2.1.20), I could go ahead with a review of this. BTW, this package has rpath problems on x86_64. This seems to be fixed by the usual technique of addingg BR: libtool and then adding LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool on the make line. I have no idea if this breaks anything. There seems to be an included test suite but no %check section in the spec. Yep, I'm still alive. I'll take a look at it briefly. http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/yaz.spec http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/yaz-2.1.22-1.src.rpm * Tue Jun 20 2006 Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon> - 2.1.22-1 - Version 2.1.22 - Libtoolize correctly - BuildRequire libxslt - BuildRequire tcp_wrappers - Enable pth in configure - Add %%check routine Builds fine in mock (x86_64, development) and rpmlint is quiet. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. * source files match upstream: 2d401ea471a87e7a056ea2df9e2d9d14 yaz-2.1.22.tar.gz * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (x86_64, development). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libyaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm libyaz.so.2()(64bit) libyazthread.so.2()(64bit) libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6 = /sbin/ldconfig libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libexslt.so.0()(64bit) libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit) libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libwrap.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxslt.so.1()(64bit) libyaz.so.2()(64bit) libyazthread.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libyaz-devel-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm libyaz-devel = 2.1.22-1.fc6 = /bin/sh libxml2-devel libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6 libyaz.so.2()(64bit) libyazthread.so.2()(64bit) openssl-devel readline-devel yaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm yaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libexslt.so.0()(64bit) libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit) libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit) libhistory.so.5()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) libwrap.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libxslt.so.1()(64bit) libyaz.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called and unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: =================== All 21 tests passed =================== * scriptlets present and OK (ldconfig calls) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers present in -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED This package has been in the repo for a couple of weeks now; any reason this bug hasn't been closed? Just lack of attention. :) Closing, thanks. Please create EPEL branches: Branches: EL-4, EL-5 done Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: yaz New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku Git done (by process-git-requests). |