Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1757955
Summary: | clamav-0.102.2 is available | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring> |
Component: | clamav | Assignee: | Sergio Basto <sergio> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anon.amish, bennie.joubert, cepheid, h.reindl, janfrode, j, kretschmer.jens, lee.jnk, liedekef, ondrejj, orion, redhat-bugzilla, rh-bugzilla, sergio, steve |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | clamav-0.102.2-2.fc30 clamav-0.102.2-2.fc31 clamav-0.102.2-2.el8 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-02-19 01:28:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Upstream Release Monitoring
2019-10-02 19:49:58 UTC
The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source declarations if possible. - clamav-0.102.0-norar.tar.xz - main-58.cvd - clamd-gen - daily-25550.cvd - bytecode-330.cvd - clamd.sysconfig - freshclam-sleep - freshclam.sysconfig - clamav-update.crond - clamav-update.logrotate - clamd.logrotate - README.fedora - clamav-milter.upstart - clamav-milter.sysv - clamav-milter.systemd - clamd.scan.upstart - clamd - clamd-README - clamd-wrapper - clamd@.service - clamd.SERVICE.init Note that the new on-access component has a hard dependency on libcurl >= 7.45, which means that EPEL6 and EPEL7 will have to build with --disable-clamonacc (and lose all support for on-access scanning). Please don't disable on-access scanning for EPEL7, that would greatly impact lots of customers. The solution seems to be the same as was being done in EPEL6 for zlib: include the libcurl sources and create a static lib, then build/link against that lib. Latest upstream release: 0.102.1 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.101.4-3.fc32 URL: http://www.clamav.net/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/291/ The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source declarations if possible. - clamav-0.102.1-norar.tar.xz - main-58.cvd - daily-25550.cvd - bytecode-330.cvd - clamd.sysconfig - freshclam-sleep - freshclam.sysconfig - clamav-update.crond - clamav-update.logrotate - clamd.logrotate - README.fedora - clamav-milter.upstart - clamav-milter.sysv - clamav-milter.systemd - clamd.scan.upstart - clamd - clamd-README - clamd-wrapper - clamd@.service - clamd.SERVICE.init need for EPEL- 6/7/8 also 😊. thanks. Need is a strong word :). I suspect we'll let this bake in Fedora for a while first. And in fact we haven't even got this into rawhide yet due to various issues. bodhi stopped to push update since Friday , as you can see [1], I'm trying fix very old bug reports like bug #801994 (opened in 2012) and others details and fixes , after push these fixes to epel 7 , I think we are ready to update clamav to 102 that is my plan [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7e948a3067 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-95898d6094 we use many packages in EPEL(RHEL/CentOS) by rebuilding Fedora 31 SRPMS. so will be happy to get the SRPM of test build on Fedora first . we will test and give feedback. thanks meanwhile clamav-0.101.5-7.fc31 available [1] we have to wait that bodhi starts to work again ... [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1432994 *** Bug 1796206 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** bodhi stopped to push updates since Friday 24 ,after clamav-0.101.5-7 tested , we move to 102.1 Successfully rebuilt from srpm for CentOS/RHEL 7. and using now. no issues. thanks. clamav-0.101.5-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bb00a8235a clamav-0.101.5-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. "Fixed In Version: clamav-0.101.5-7.fc30" is a joke given that in my world 0.101 is smaller than 0.102 FEDORA-2020-eb709b2d86 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eb709b2d86 FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5ef018f3f7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5ef018f3f7 FEDORA-2020-a353378275 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a353378275 clamav-0.102.2-2.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5ef018f3f7 Will this also be updated on EPEL 7? Thanks! clamav-0.102.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eb709b2d86 clamav-0.102.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a353378275 (In reply to Amir Caspi from comment #22) > Will this also be updated on EPEL 7? Thanks! Almost certainly. But personally I'd like to see this bake a bit in Fedora first. clamav-0.102.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. clamav-0.102.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. clamav-0.102.2-2.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #25) > (In reply to Amir Caspi from comment #22) > > Will this also be updated on EPEL 7? Thanks! > Almost certainly. But personally I'd like to see this bake a bit in Fedora > first. Could I gently request that this get promoted to EPEL 7 now? It's been a month and I haven't seen reports of major problems... Thanks! Whoops. Nevermind. It looks like this was pushed recently but no comments put onto this bug. Sorry for jumping the gun! |