Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1773371
Summary: | python-aioresponses fails to build with Python 3.8 on Fedora 32+ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Component: | python-aioresponses | Assignee: | Georg Sauthoff <fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-12-06 19:56:14 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1739895 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1750908, 1750909, 1686977, 1773378 |
Description
Miro Hrončok
2019-11-17 23:12:39 UTC
What is the plan here? Do we try to keep the package or retire it? I'll look into it next week. If possible I want to keep it. The root-cause for not building with Python 3.8 is python3-asynctest not being compatbile with Python 3.8. See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739895#c10 Perhaps we can wait some more until python3-asynctest is fixed? nothing provides python3.8dist(pathtools) >= 0.1.1 needed by python3-watchdog-0.8.3-13.fc32.noarch That said, i don't think this should actually buildrequire watchdog. Why does it? (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #4) > That said, i don't think this should actually buildrequire watchdog. Why > does it? IIRC I added it because it's listed in requirements-dev.txt. But it doesn't seem to be actually used anywhere in the code. Thus, I'll remove it. With that change the package builds again: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39453522 |