Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1774617
| Summary: | mpv reported as package to be installed and skipped at the same time | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Pavla Kratochvilova <pkratoch> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | jmracek, jrohel, mblaha, mhatina, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-4.2.21-1.fc32 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-05-01 04:04:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
The package is incorrectly reported as skipped (both in the transaction table and in the post-transaction summary). The dependency problems reported before the transaction table are probably expected, since these should be problems in installing the best candidates before falling back to non-best ones. PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1581 Test: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/778 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32. FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-68aa5586ed has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Description of problem: This is very confusing output: ~~~ $ sudo dnf update -x kernel\* -x libtomcrypt -x python3-paste Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:38 ago on Wed Nov 20 15:36:43 2019. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: package mpv-0.30.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libdvdread.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libdvdread-6.0.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and libdvdread-6.0.1-2.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package mpv-0.29.1-18.20191011.gita85fa2d.fc32.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package libdvdread-6.0.1-2.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package mpv-0.29.1-18.20191011.gita85fa2d.fc32.x86_64 - package mpv-0.29.1-18.20191011.gita85fa2d.fc32.x86_64 requires libdvdread.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package mpv-0.30.0-1.fc32.x86_64 requires libdvdread.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libdvdread-6.0.2-2.fc32.x86_64 and libdvdread-6.0.1-2.fc31.x86_64 - package gnome-disk-utility-3.34.0-2.fc32.x86_64 requires libdvdread.so.7()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package gnome-disk-utility-3.34.0-1.fc32.x86_64 ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repo Size ================================================================================ Upgrading: ... snip ... mpv x86_64 0.30.0-1.fc32 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 1.3 M ... snip ... Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): libdvdread x86_64 6.0.2-2.fc32 rawhide 70 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: gnome-disk-utility x86_64 3.34.0-2.fc32 rawhide 1.1 M mpv x86_64 0.30.0-1.fc32 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 1.3 M ... snip ... ~~~ I wonder how it is possible that 'mpv' is reported to be updated and at the same time reported as being skipped due to broken dependencies. What will be the result? It is probably updatable: ~~~ $ LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 sudo dnf update -x kernel\* -x libtomcrypt -x python3-paste mpv Last metadata expiration check: 0:13:00 ago on Wed Nov 20 15:36:43 2019. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Upgrading: mpv x86_64 0.30.0-1.fc32 rpmfusion-free-rawhide 1.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Upgrade 1 Package Total download size: 1.3 M Is this ok [y/N]: ~~~ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: $ rpm -q dnf libsolv dnf-4.2.15-2.fc32.noarch libsolv-0.7.8-1.fc32.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: It is not clear if mpv is going to be updated or not. Expected results: It is clear if mpv is going to be udpated or not. Additional info: $ rpm -q libdvdread mpv libdvdread-6.0.1-2.fc31.x86_64 mpv-0.29.1-18.20191011.gita85fa2d.fc32.x86_64