Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1790436
Summary: | Supermin fails to mount root due to virtio modprobe failure on power9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jakub Čajka <jcajka> |
Component: | SLOF | Assignee: | Fedora Virtualization Maintainers <virt-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 31 | CC: | crobinso, dan, gduarte, menantea, pbonzini, ptoscano, rjones, virt-maint |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ppc64le | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | SLOF-0.1.git20191022-1.fc31 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-03-06 21:44:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1071880 |
Description
Jakub Čajka
2020-01-13 11:04:26 UTC
That error is weird: [ 0.561795] virtio_scsi: probe of virtio3 failed with error -22 errno 22 = EINVAL Similar bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1847440 The suggested solution there was to update SLOF (the virtual firmware). H(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #2) > Similar bug here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1847440 > > The suggested solution there was to update SLOF (the virtual firmware). I have also run build witch used virt-preview repo(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/virtmaint-sig/virt-preview/) and I hit same issue. AFAIK it should contain the patched SLOF version(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/virtmaint-sig/virt-preview/build/1092953/). For the record coreos assembler tracking issue https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler/issues/1041 . I have done more testing with different SLOF versions and qemu(with and without virt-preview repo) and it seems that using qemu-slof-20191209 SLOF version with the qemu from F31 works. I'm still looking on what is minimal version of SLOF that will work in this case. I have done more testing and it seems to be resolved with the most recent SLOF. I have tested it both on p9 and p8 hosts with success. So switching this to SLOF. Could we get rebase to qemu-slof-20191217 in F31? For the record I have not been able to run coreos assembler(qemu in container) with virt-preview repo enabled on f31(latest kernel) host, with the up mentioned issue/error, both with virt-preview version of SLOF or "mine" latest(qemu-slof-20191217). On power9 bare metal host. (In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #7) > For the record I have not been able to run coreos assembler(qemu in > container) with virt-preview repo enabled on f31(latest kernel) host, with > the up mentioned issue/error, both with virt-preview version of SLOF or > "mine" latest(qemu-slof-20191217). On power9 bare metal host. I'm a bit confused, is this an additional problem, or does this invalidate your suggestion to backport rawhide SLOF to f31? I'm happy to do the f31 build if that improves things for you (In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #8) > (In reply to Jakub Čajka from comment #7) > > For the record I have not been able to run coreos assembler(qemu in > > container) with virt-preview repo enabled on f31(latest kernel) host, with > > the up mentioned issue/error, both with virt-preview version of SLOF or > > "mine" latest(qemu-slof-20191217). On power9 bare metal host. > > I'm a bit confused, is this an additional problem, or does this invalidate > your suggestion to backport rawhide SLOF to f31? > That has been note that I have not been able to run build of coreos/run supermin with the virt-preview repo enabled and using packages from it(regardless on version of SLOF used). Sorry for confusion. > I'm happy to do the f31 build if that improves things for you Thank you. I would very much appreciate that, if that is possible as it resolves issue that I have hit. SLOF-0.1.git20191022-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cf8a0689a8 SLOF-0.1.git20191022-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |