| Summary: | mumble: build for epel8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | tsuned49 |
| Component: | mumble | Assignee: | John <johnhatestrash> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | carl, chkr, j.golderer, johnhatestrash, rdieter, tomislav.parcina, vascom2 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | 1928156, 1677947, 1980578 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
tsuned49
2020-01-15 17:32:47 UTC
can you build mumble for epel8 Need to update mumble to 1.3.0 first with Qt 5 support. I don't know what pulseaudio-devel and speechhd-devel are. Mumble has build requirements on speech-dispatcher-devel and pulseaudio-libs-devel. In CentOS, those are available in PowerTools and AppStream, respectively. If there are any missing build requirements in CentOS, the process to request those is documented here: https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS8/UnshippedPackages This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. This message is a reminder that Fedora 31 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 31 on 2020-11-24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '31'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 31 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. *** Bug 1902334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Carl, is there any chance that this will be resolved soon? Is there anything I can do to speed up things a bit? I only recently became the maintainer of this package, and I've got work to do getting mumbled updated to 1.3.3, switching to the bundled celt library, and general spec file clean up. I'm making some progress on that, but I'm not finished yet. Once I'm caught up I'll attempt to build it for epel8. Now that I have bug 1885088 and bug 1904471 resolved, I tried to do a build against epel8. It fails with these error. cc1plus: error: one or more PCH files were found, but they were invalid cc1plus: error: use -Winvalid-pch for more information cc1plus: fatal error: release/mumble: No such file or directory This same spec file is working on f33/f34, so I suspect something is different between the dependencies that is causing it to fail only on epel8. I'm open to suggestions on how to resolve this. Fatal error is:
cc1plus: fatal error: release/mumble: No such file or directory
Isn't that spec file related? Should it be solvable with right spec file configuration?
I repeat, the exact same spec file builds fine on f33/f34 but fails on epel8, so I don't see how it's a spec file problem. Happy to be proven wrong if I'm missing something. My theory is that mumble has an undocumented minimum version of one of the build requirements, but I haven't proven it yet. I was also able to do successful local builds all the way back to f28, so I'm comparing the build requirement versions of that and el8 to see what jumps out at me. I've learned the cause of the "one or more PCH files were found, but they were invalid" error. RHEL8's hardened gcc is incompatible with PCH [0]. PCH must be disabled in software when compiling software for RHEL8. The current mumble 1.3 branch has an undocumented "no-pch" config option that accomplishes this [1]. I'll also note that the upcoming mumble 1.4 does away with PCH as part of their migration to cmake [2]. Adding "no-pch" to the spec file allows it to build for epel8. The only thing stopping me now is the lack of rnnoise in epel8, which I have requested [3]. [0] bug 1721553 comment 38 [1] https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble/blob/1.3.4/qmake/compiler.pri#L420-L424 [2] https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble/pull/4252 [3] bug 1980578 The test build I did that worked was 1.3.4-1 with the "no-pch" option, but without the rnnoise option. Enabling both causes the the build to fail again. After some investigation, I think the cause is some incompatibility between the rnnoise code and RHEL 8's qt 5.12. I was able to do a successful build in epel8-next [0] with CentOS Stream 8's qt 5.15. I have submitted that as an update [1]. Once qt 5.15 is released with RHEL 8.5 later this year, I'll be able to do a regular epel8 build for this. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Next [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2021-8af560b3b3 This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. |