Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1794480
| Summary: | tucnak2-2.31-20.fc32 FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: alsa.o: in function `$d': /builddir/build/BUILD/tucnak2-2.31/src/header.h:3461: multiple definition of `rotar'; adif.o:/builddir/build/BUILD/tucnak2-2.31/src/header.h:3461: first defined here | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
| Component: | tucnak2 | Assignee: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | jskarvad, lucilanga |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| URL: | https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/tucnak2?collection=f32 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | tucnak2-2.31-20.fc32.1 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-03-16 20:20:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1750908, 1792464 | ||
|
Description
Petr Pisar
2020-01-23 17:01:53 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32. Dear Maintainer, your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks. A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule I think we could keep this in new state and let the process to orphan/retire it, because we already have tucnak v4 in Fedora. The package has been retired in f33 (currently rawhide) and it has been replaced by the 'tucnak' package (it's available since f30 in the stable repo). So I don't know what to do with the f32. We are probably not going to fix the tucnak2 package in the f32 and according to the package retirement guidelines we shouldn't retire the package after the branching. I will probably keep this bugzilla to die :) Dear Maintainer, your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks. A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule It's simple to workaround, but we would have to also update the tucnak package not to break the upgrade path. I would rather avoid it, so I will try to close this bug (because according to the guidelines we shouldn't retire packages in non rawhide branches - this package is already retired in the rawhide / f33). Finally, I will workaround the problem, because I found solution how to bump the release without need of rebuilt of the tucnak package. FEDORA-2020-be345431a4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-be345431a4 tucnak2-2.31-20.fc32.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-be345431a4 tucnak2-2.31-20.fc32.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. tucnak2-2.31-20.fc32.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |