Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1799473
Summary: | gromacs: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||
Component: | gromacs | Assignee: | Christoph Junghans <junghans> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
Version: | 32 | CC: | dakingun, dominik, junghans, orion | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | junghans:
needinfo+
|
||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2020-02-23 23:34:30 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1750908 | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2020-02-06 17:16:54 UTC
Created attachment 1659221 [details]
build.log
file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1659222 [details]
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1659223 [details]
state.log
The ppc64 error: -- Could not find any flag to build test source (this could be due to either the compiler or binutils) CMake Error at cmake/gmxManageSimd.cmake:51 (message): Cannot find IBM VSX compiler flag. Use a newer compiler, or disable SIMD support (slower). Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/gmxManageSimd.cmake:265 (gmx_give_fatal_error_when_simd_support_not_found) CMakeLists.txt:719 (gmx_manage_simd) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Something is wrong with SIMD flag. On aarch64 the error is: Mdrun cannot use the requested (or automatic) number of ranks, retrying with 8. Abnormal return value for ' gmx mdrun -nb cpu -notunepme >mdrun.out 2>&1' was 1 Retrying mdrun with better settings... ..... 98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 46 Label Time Summary: GTest = 33.68 sec*proc (40 tests) IntegrationTest = 6.53 sec*proc (5 tests) MpiTest = 2.22 sec*proc (3 tests) SlowTest = 20.76 sec*proc (1 test) UnitTest = 6.39 sec*proc (34 tests) Total Test time (real) = 2697.26 sec The following tests FAILED: 43 - regressiontests/kernel (Timeout) Errors while running CTest Using "mock -r fedora-rawhide-ppc64le --no-clean gromacs-2019.5-2.fc32.1.src.rpm" I get a: +++ /usr/bin/ps -p 160 -ocomm= Signal 4 (ILL) caught by ps (3.3.15). /usr/bin/ps:ps/display.c:66: please report this bug ++ my_shell= This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle. Changing version to 32. Details on the aarch64 error: 22/27 Test #22: UtilityMpiUnitTests ..............***Failed 0.52 sec Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) INTERNAL ERROR: invalid error code fffffffe (Ring Index out of range) in MPID_nem_tcp_init:373 Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) INTERNAL ERROR: invalid error code fffffffe (Ring Index out of range) in MPID_nem_tcp_init:373 Fatal error in PMPI_Init_thread: Other MPI error, error stack: MPIR_Init_thread(586)..............: MPID_Init(224).....................: channel initialization failed MPIDI_CH3_Init(105)................: MPID_nem_init(324).................: MPID_nem_tcp_init(175).............: MPID_nem_tcp_get_business_card(401): MPID_nem_tcp_init(373).............: gethostbyname failed, 9642102373514ac7b8330d80c6ee96d2 (errno 0) Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) Fatal error in PMPI_Init_thread: Other MPI error, error stack: MPIR_Init_thread(586)..............: MPID_Init(224).....................: channel initialization failed MPIDI_CH3_Init(105)................: MPID_nem_init(324).................: MPID_nem_tcp_init(175).............: MPID_nem_tcp_get_business_card(401): MPID_nem_tcp_init(373).............: gethostbyname failed, 9642102373514ac7b8330d80c6ee96d2 (errno 0) So this seems to be a bug in mpich. ppc64le issue reported upstream: https://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/3380 (In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #7) > Details on the aarch64 error: > 22/27 Test #22: UtilityMpiUnitTests ..............***Failed 0.52 sec > Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) > INTERNAL ERROR: invalid error code fffffffe (Ring Index out of range) in > MPID_nem_tcp_init:373 > Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) > INTERNAL ERROR: invalid error code fffffffe (Ring Index out of range) in > MPID_nem_tcp_init:373 > Fatal error in PMPI_Init_thread: Other MPI error, error stack: > MPIR_Init_thread(586)..............: > MPID_Init(224).....................: channel initialization failed > MPIDI_CH3_Init(105)................: > MPID_nem_init(324).................: > MPID_nem_tcp_init(175).............: > MPID_nem_tcp_get_business_card(401): > MPID_nem_tcp_init(373).............: gethostbyname failed, > 9642102373514ac7b8330d80c6ee96d2 (errno 0) > Invalid error code (-2) (error ring index 127 invalid) > Fatal error in PMPI_Init_thread: Other MPI error, error stack: > MPIR_Init_thread(586)..............: > MPID_Init(224).....................: channel initialization failed > MPIDI_CH3_Init(105)................: > MPID_nem_init(324).................: > MPID_nem_tcp_init(175).............: > MPID_nem_tcp_get_business_card(401): > MPID_nem_tcp_init(373).............: gethostbyname failed, > 9642102373514ac7b8330d80c6ee96d2 (errno 0) > > So this seems to be a bug in mpich. MPICH issuue patched here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpich/pull-request/2 Dear Maintainer, your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks. A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule |