Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1807252
| Summary: | bootloader entry missing after installation on armhfp | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul Whalen <pwhalen> | ||||||||||||||
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Vendula Poncova <vponcova> | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||||||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, gmarr, jkonecny, jonathan, kellin, pbrobinson, robatino, sgallagh, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vponcova, wwoods | ||||||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
| Hardware: | armhfp | ||||||||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedFreezeException | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | anaconda-32.24.2-3 anaconda-32.24.2-3.fc32 anaconda-32.24.3-1.fc32 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-03-12 14:26:37 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418, 1705303, 1705304 | ||||||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Description
Paul Whalen
2020-02-25 22:13:30 UTC
Created attachment 1665737 [details]
anaconda log
Created attachment 1665738 [details]
dbus log
Created attachment 1665739 [details]
packaging log
Created attachment 1665740 [details]
program log
Created attachment 1665741 [details]
storage log
Created attachment 1665742 [details]
syslog
Fixed in a pull request: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2346 Proposed as a Blocker for 32-beta by Fedora user pbrobinson using the blocker tracking app because: Causing issues on installing ARMv7 systems. Discussed during the 2020-03-02 blocker review meeting: [0] The decision to delay the classification of this as a blocker bug was made as while would accept this bug as a blocker, we are unsure if the criteria apply to 32-bit ARM images. We will get clarification on this and make a decision next meeting. [0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2020-03-02/f32-blocker-review.2020-03-02-17.00.txt Fixed in Rawhide: anaconda-33.2-1 Geoffrey overlooked it, but this was accepted as a Beta FE in the meeting: "AGREED: punt (delay decision) on blocker, AcceptedFreezeException (Beta), provisionally accepted as a blocker if any 32-bit ARM installer issues can be blockers - this is clearly a blocker *if 32-bit ARM installer issues can be blockers*, we are currently not entirely clear on that point. we will clear this up in discussion with ARM folks and FESCo and update bug as appropriate" marking as AcceptedFE. Vendula, can we have it in the next 32 build? Thanks! FEDORA-2020-e6435e1b12 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e6435e1b12 I created a FESCo ticket to settle the question of whether we ought to block on bugs like this: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2354 Discussed during the 2020-03-09 blocker review meeting: [0] The decision to delay the classification of this as a blocker bug was made as we still don't have definitive word on whether we should block on 32-bit ARM installer issues currently, but this is accepted FE and a fix will be included in the next build. [0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2020-03-09/f32-blocker-review.2020-03-09-16.01.txt properly tag as accepted FE :/ anaconda-32.24.2-3.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e6435e1b12 This is a blocker per FESCo decision in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2339#comment-628299 Er. Did you link to the wrong ticket? That one doesn't seem relevant to this bug. That was about changing the ARM blocking desktop from Xfce on 32-bit ARM to Workstation on 64-bit ARM. (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #18) > Er. Did you link to the wrong ticket? That one doesn't seem relevant to this > bug. That was about changing the ARM blocking desktop from Xfce on 32-bit > ARM to Workstation on 64-bit ARM. You're correct. I was confusing this with https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2354 which is still undecided (though it looks likely to be declared blocking once the rest of FESCo votes). anaconda-32.24.2-3.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-84ddf3ee4d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-84ddf3ee4d anaconda-32.24.3-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-84ddf3ee4d anaconda-32.24.3-1.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |