Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 181035
Summary: | Review Request: luks-tools | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | W. Michael Petullo <redhat> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jochen Schmitt <jochen> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | astrand, opensource | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-13 22:04:02 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 166035 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
W. Michael Petullo
2006-02-11 23:14:34 UTC
Local build failed: checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64 checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.7.4) checking for cryptsetup... no configure: error: cryptsetup executable not found in your path Fehler: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78258 (%build) RPM build errors: InstallSourcePackage: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID cb278bd5 user mike does not exist - using root group mike does not exist - using root user mike does not exist - using root group mike does not exist - using root Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78258 (%build) Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.8-2.src.rpm Created attachment 130765 [details]
Make luks-setup build clean on FC5
The attached patch adds a BuildRequires on check-devel and adds /sbin:/usr/sbin
to the path to the call to %configure so that it picks up cryptsetup and other
tools that it uses.
Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.9-2.src.rpm Hey Jochen. You moved this to FE-REVIEW, but didn't assign it to yourself. I am doing that now. If you are not going to review this, go ahead and reassign to nobody and set it back to block FE-NEW. I will got the following complaint: Source luks-tools-0.0.9.tar.gz is different from upstream Luks-tools 0.0.10 is synchronized with the upstream version: Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.10-1.src.rpm Good: + Source match with upstream. + Mock build works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints luks-tools W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyo 0644 W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyc 0644 Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.10-2.src.rpm Bad: - rpmlint luks-tools complaints: $ rpmlint luks-tools-0.0.10-2.i386.rpm W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyo 0644 W: luks-tools non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gnome-luks-format.pyc 0644 Okay, I was not familiar with brp-python-bytecompile. Spec Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/luks-tools-0.0.11-1.src.rpm Good: + Local build works fine for FC-5. + Rpmlint has no complaints for binary rpm. + Rpmlint has no complaints for installed rpm. + Tar ball matched with upstream. + Binaries doesn't crash during startup. + Verbatin copy of license in %doc + License is GPLv2 + Mock build works fine for FC-5 Your package is APPOVED !!1 |