Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1820191

Summary: arping location has changed - file context pattern is not applied
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 32CC: dwalsh, grepl.miroslav, lvrabec, plautrba, vmojzis, zpytela
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1952515 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-04 15:01:39 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1952515    

Description Milos Malik 2020-04-02 13:36:36 UTC
Description of problem:
# semanage fcontext -l | grep arping
/sbin/arping                                       regular file       system_u:object_r:netutils_exec_t:s0 
/usr/sbin/arping                                   regular file       system_u:object_r:netutils_exec_t:s0 
# ls -iZ /sbin/arping
8925261 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /sbin/arping
# ls -iZ /usr/sbin/arping
8925261 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /usr/sbin/arping
# ls -iZ /bin/arping
2240758 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/arping
# ls -iZ /sbin/arping
8925261 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /sbin/arping
# 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
iputils-20190515-5.fc32.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-devel-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-doc-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-mls-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-sandbox-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.5-32.fc32.noarch

How reproducible:
 * always

Actual results:
 * none of the arping files is labeled netutils_exec_t

Expected results:
 * the arping file (which is NOT a symlink) is labeled netutils_exec_t

Comment 1 Milos Malik 2020-04-02 13:41:15 UTC
The comment#0 contains a duplicate location. Here are all possible locations without duplicates:

# ls -iZ /sbin/arping
8925261 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /sbin/arping
# ls -iZ /usr/sbin/arping
8925261 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /usr/sbin/arping
# ls -iZ /bin/arping
2240758 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/arping
# ls -iZ /usr/bin/arping
2240758 system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /usr/bin/arping
# 

None of them is labeled correctly.

Comment 2 Zdenek Pytela 2020-04-02 14:41:38 UTC
Milosi,

Thank you for reporting. It seems to be okay in F30, but not in later releases. Looks like the binary moved from sbin to bin somewhere between iputils-20180629 and iputils-20190515, with a symlink for compatibility. So the sbin one now seems to be labeled correctly, but label for bin/arping needs to be added to the policy.

This is what I can see on a clean installation:

# ls -liZ /usr/sbin/arping /usr/bin/arping
2393024 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 36224 Feb  3 13:23 /usr/bin/arping
2422957 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0    13 Feb  3 13:23 /usr/sbin/arping -> ../bin/arping

# rpm -qf /usr/sbin/arping /usr/bin/arping
iputils-20190515-5.fc32.x86_64
iputils-20190515-5.fc32.x86_64

# matchpathcon /usr/sbin/arping /usr/bin/arping
/usr/sbin/arping        system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
/usr/bin/arping system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0

Comment 3 Zdenek Pytela 2020-04-03 08:01:47 UTC
I've submitted a Fedora PR to address the issue:
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/341

Comment 4 Lukas Vrabec 2020-04-03 10:23:46 UTC
Fixed in Fedora: 


commit dad6a809df19a66c66b43cf0684671a806d872dd (HEAD -> rawhide, origin/rawhide)
Author: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Date:   Fri Apr 3 09:38:33 2020 +0200

    Modify path for arping in netutils.fc to match both bin and sbin
    
    In iputils newer than iputils-20180629 the arping command moved from
    /sbin to /bin, hence the path in the netutils.fc file needs to be
    adjusted so that it matches both possible paths for the actual file.
    Symlink can have bin_t assigned.
    
    Resolves: rhbz#1820191

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-04-08 11:52:56 UTC
FEDORA-2020-2fad1f552d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2fad1f552d

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-04-09 18:38:04 UTC
FEDORA-2020-2fad1f552d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-2fad1f552d`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2fad1f552d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Program Management 2021-04-29 17:16:09 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '32'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.