Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1820412
Summary: | Foobillard rendering is terribly slow on F32 beta | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dmitry Burstein <dmitryburstein> |
Component: | foobillard | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 32 | CC: | gwync |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | foobillard-3.0a-34.fc32 foobillard-master-3220200505103437.1 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-05-03 05:29:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dmitry Burstein
2020-04-03 02:25:15 UTC
I see this on an f32 beta VM. I tried rebuilding foobillard with glut rendering enabled and it worked great on f31 but not f32. Do you see this with any other GL games? I'm not sure I have any others. Darktable runs fine, but I'm not sure it has GL enabled. If you want me to test something else - game or benchmark - no problem, just tell me what to run. Try vdrift and armacycles-ad. Tried them both just now, and they are working fine. Odd. I've tried a few build options and found nothing that fixes it. The foobillard++ works, but crashes a lot. :) I'm currently looking at the various components it relies and to see what might have changed. Good luck! If you need me to install something else to try - just ask. How about bzflag, BlockOutII and xmoto? All of them are working fine as well. All of my testing has been on GNOME. I assume yours has as well. Do you see the same issue on another DE, such as KDE, MATE, Cinnnamon, WindowMaker, etc? No, sorry, don't have any of those around. This build should work. Please confirm. https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/foobillard-3.0a-34.fc32.x86_64.rpm Yes indeed - it's back in all its glory :D Great job, thanks a lot! Even in time for the release the next week - kudos. Thank you! I was motivated, I play this and want to upgrade. :) FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8 FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-a3d94f11b8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-02ee9217f5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-02ee9217f5 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-02ee9217f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-02ee9217f5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-02ee9217f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |