Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1822597
Summary: | gstreamer-plugins- bad/bad-nonfree/ugly obsoleted needlessly | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | ozeszty <ozeszty+rhbz> |
Component: | fedora-obsolete-packages | Assignee: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 32 | CC: | j, mhroncok, xavier |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | fedora-obsolete-packages-32-48 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-05-07 03:10:14 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
ozeszty
2020-04-09 13:07:13 UTC
I can confirm this bug. I had the following error when upgrading a box: """ Problem: both package rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-32-2.fc32.noarch and fedora-obsolete-packages-32-44.noarch obsolete gstreamer-plugins-ugly < 0.10.19-34 """ fedora-obsolete-packages has no business obsoleting a package that was not provided in Fedora, especially if DNF errors out with such an issue and prevent the upgrade to run. The problem was introduced in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/c/4493c3676c97b330742fb0e4eb2ff894e21400ec?branch=master by a provenpackager. Maybe we should enable pull request access only? Lets remove those. > PS These 'Provides:' statements shouldn't be there, right? Correct. BTW I was not a avare that two packages cannot obsolete one package :/ FEDORA-2020-b151af48ef has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b151af48ef The update keeps obsoleting the older updates. I'd appreciate if you could actually test this and provide karma, so we can finally have a version that reaches stable. FEDORA-2020-b151af48ef has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |