Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1825984

Summary:	Enable new DNF countme option
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Michal Domonkos <mdomonko>
Component:	epel-release	Assignee:	Michael Stahnke <mastahnke>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	dennis, kevin, mastahnke, mattdm, smooge
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	epel-release-8-9.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-11-16 00:28:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michal Domonkos 2020-04-20 16:00:23 UTC

This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #1737516

I am copying this bug because: 

AFAIK, the EPEL project would also like to benefit from this DNF feature, so in order to count the EPEL users, please add "countme=1" to the epel.repo file.

Original bug:



With the introduction of the "countme" feature [1] to DNF in Fedora 31, we will need to have the following option added to the default repo configs (since the global default in DNF is going to be "0"):


[fedora]
...
countme=1


[updates]
...
countme=1


Note that the choice of "fedora" and "updates" repos is just my good guess.  Which repos exactly we'd like to enable counting on will (probably) depend on FESCo's decision.  Maybe Matt or Stephen could help us here?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting
    https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/768

Comment 1 Matthew Miller 2020-04-22 16:06:25 UTC

In this case, of course, the repos are [epel], [epel-testing], and [epel-playground]

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2020-04-22 16:58:24 UTC

So, to clarify: This is epel8 only right? epel6/7 don't use/have the dnf part of this so it makes no sense to enable there?

Also, should modular repos be enabled?

Comment 3 Michal Domonkos 2020-04-22 17:31:21 UTC

(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #2)
> So, to clarify: This is epel8 only right? epel6/7 don't use/have the dnf
> part of this so it makes no sense to enable there?

Correct.

> Also, should modular repos be enabled?

Not sure (Matt?)

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-10-31 20:34:21 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7bacc32a2f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7bacc32a2f

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-11-01 01:20:06 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7bacc32a2f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7bacc32a2f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-11-16 00:28:27 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7bacc32a2f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.