Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 184104
Summary: | Review Request: acpi - Command-line ACPI client | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jose.p.oliveira.oss | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-03-17 22:07:42 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-03-06 10:37:20 UTC
Patrice, Could you check the Extras' package acpitool? I can be wrong but acpitool appears to provide more features than this one. jpo I do agree, as the acpitool fedora extra maintainer ;-). I allready said so on the fedora-devel-list. But even if it has less features, I think it is good to have it packaged, such that user can use the one they prefer, and compare them. MD5SUMS: a9eed4c2faefd3b9ba46b5a2336e387d acpi-0.09-1.src.rpm 160bcdbb0f880f2c2b8b563f0cca1839 acpi-0.09-keep_CFLAGS.diff a5a70595834b487c3a2f9278a3d60768 acpi-0.09.tar.gz 8e809c75e4f4c285d5d167bb99600e1f acpi.spec Good: * Tarball MD5 digest verified (author homepage) * URL and Source URL are valid * License verified and included * Distro building flags are honored * File permissions are ok * Builds without problems in FC-3 and FC-4 * (Un)installs without problems in FC-3 and FC-4 NeedsWork: * Dist tag missing Minor note: * the commented man page installation line should be removed (the last version that had a man page was the 0.06). Created attachment 126172 [details]
acpi.spec patch
The patch does the following:
* add the missing dist tag
* removes the commented line (man page installation)
* expands a tab and removes a couple of spaces (pedantic)
Updated here. As a side note, I don't think that a missing %{?dist} should be noted as a blocker... Not a big deal. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/acpi-0.09-1.src.rpm APPROVED MD5SUMS: b4037e9b16fe61ac32f58208bc76f73d acpi-0.09-1.src.rpm 160bcdbb0f880f2c2b8b563f0cca1839 acpi-0.09-keep_CFLAGS.diff a5a70595834b487c3a2f9278a3d60768 acpi-0.09.tar.gz 2581b336c3b1dfc3f0ded0bf923d5065 acpi.spec (In reply to comment #5) > Updated here. As a side note, I don't think that a missing %{?dist} > should be noted as a blocker... Not a big deal. Under normal circunstances I would have said to update the specfile after having imported the package into the CVS server but, right now I don't have much free time to process all the emails I receive in order to verify the CVS commits. Any way, sorry for the inconvinience, jpo No inconvenience, and I would have added the dist tag anyway, but I made that comment such that people that view the bug do not think that the dist tag is mandatory... |