Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 184104

Summary: Review Request: acpi - Command-line ACPI client
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Patrice Dumas <pertusus>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jose.p.oliveira.oss
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-17 22:07:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    
Description Flags
acpi.spec patch none

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-03-06 10:37:20 UTC
SRPM Name or Url:

Linux ACPI client is a small command-line program that attempts to
replicate the functionality of the 'old' apm command on ACPI systems.
It includes battery and thermal information.

Comment 1 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-03-14 16:47:04 UTC

Could you check the Extras' package acpitool?
I can be wrong but acpitool appears to provide more features than this one.


Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-14 16:54:47 UTC
I do agree, as the acpitool fedora extra maintainer ;-). I allready said so on
the fedora-devel-list. But even if it has less features, I think it is good to
have it packaged, such that user can use the one they prefer, and compare them.

Comment 3 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-03-15 20:51:00 UTC
a9eed4c2faefd3b9ba46b5a2336e387d  acpi-0.09-1.src.rpm

160bcdbb0f880f2c2b8b563f0cca1839  acpi-0.09-keep_CFLAGS.diff
a5a70595834b487c3a2f9278a3d60768  acpi-0.09.tar.gz
8e809c75e4f4c285d5d167bb99600e1f  acpi.spec

* Tarball MD5 digest verified (author homepage)
* URL and Source URL are valid
* License verified and included
* Distro building flags are honored
* File permissions are ok
* Builds without problems in FC-3 and FC-4
* (Un)installs without problems in FC-3 and FC-4

* Dist tag missing

Minor note:
* the commented man page installation line should be removed
  (the last version that had a man page was the 0.06).

Comment 4 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-03-15 20:56:42 UTC
Created attachment 126172 [details]
acpi.spec patch

The patch does the following:
* add the missing dist tag
* removes the commented line (man page installation)
* expands a tab and removes a couple of spaces (pedantic)

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-16 22:27:33 UTC
Updated here. As a side note, I don't think that a missing %{?dist}
should be noted as a blocker... Not a big deal.

Comment 6 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-03-17 20:02:47 UTC

b4037e9b16fe61ac32f58208bc76f73d  acpi-0.09-1.src.rpm

160bcdbb0f880f2c2b8b563f0cca1839  acpi-0.09-keep_CFLAGS.diff
a5a70595834b487c3a2f9278a3d60768  acpi-0.09.tar.gz
2581b336c3b1dfc3f0ded0bf923d5065  acpi.spec

(In reply to comment #5)
> Updated here. As a side note, I don't think that a missing %{?dist}
> should be noted as a blocker... Not a big deal.

Under normal circunstances I would have said to update the specfile after having
imported the package into the CVS server but, right now I don't have much free
time to process all the emails I receive in order to verify the CVS commits.

Any way, sorry for the inconvinience,

Comment 7 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-17 22:07:42 UTC
No inconvenience, and I would have added the dist tag anyway, but I made that
comment such that people that view the bug do not think that the dist tag is