Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1841960
| Summary: | dpdk-examples-19.11.1-2.fc32 is uninstallable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andre Robatino <robatino> |
| Component: | dpdk | Assignee: | Timothy Redaelli <tredaelli> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | aconole, linville, nhorman, tredaelli |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dpdk-19.11.1-3.fc32 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-06-14 17:01:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andre Robatino
2020-05-29 22:45:56 UTC
Can install dpdk-examples in Rawhide. Haven't tested F31. this actually seems like its pretty related to the last problem. dpdk-19.11 exists in the updates repo, so it should update that. If you run rpm -qli --whatrequires dpdk-18.11, what are the results? yeah, actually, this looks to be the exact same issue. Timothy updated dpdk to 19.11 in F32 but never seems to have pushed it, and didn't update openvswitch, like he just did in rawhide, so while it doesn't have an explicit dependency on dpdk 18.11, it has a dependency on the DSO versions in the package. When I went to fix several CVEs on DPDK in mid may for F32 I pushed the new major version and the deps broke. Tim, please rebuild ovs so it matches with the latest dpdk version and push an update for F32 [root@lenovo-pc ~]# rpm -qli --whatrequires dpdk-18.11 no package requires dpdk-18.11 [root@lenovo-pc ~]# (In reply to Neil Horman from comment #3) > yeah, actually, this looks to be the exact same issue. Timothy updated dpdk > to 19.11 in F32 but never seems to have pushed it, and didn't update > openvswitch, like he just did in rawhide, so while it doesn't have an > explicit dependency on dpdk 18.11, it has a dependency on the DSO versions > in the package. When I went to fix several CVEs on DPDK in mid may for F32 I > pushed the new major version and the deps broke. Tim, please rebuild ovs so > it matches with the latest dpdk version and push an update for F32 openvswitch 2.13 was already on Fedora 32 (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-add0c5f7c9) linked with dpdk 19.11 It's the same problem already fixed of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832416, patch backported to f32 too FEDORA-2020-2be679adfb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2be679adfb FEDORA-2020-2be679adfb has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-2be679adfb` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2be679adfb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. dpdk-19.11.1-3.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |