Bug 1844225

The fedora-review tool does not work if you do not give direct downloadable files. Hence, your package links should be

SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sumantro93/python-sphinx-pyreverse/master/python-sphinx-pyreverse.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/sumantro93/python-sphinx-pyreverse/raw/master/python-sphinx-pyreverse-0.0.13-1.fc32.src.rpm

(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
> The fedora-review tool does not work if you do not give direct downloadable
> files. Hence, your package links should be
> 
> SPEC URL:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sumantro93/python-sphinx-pyreverse/master/
> python-sphinx-pyreverse.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://github.com/sumantro93/python-sphinx-pyreverse/raw/master/python-
> sphinx-pyreverse-0.0.13-1.fc32.src.rpm

Noted. Do I have to change anything in this bug? 
I will keep this in mind for the next time.

Could you please remove the reStructuredText formatting from the descriptions?

(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #3)
> Could you please remove the reStructuredText formatting from the
> descriptions?

I updated the SPEC file.

sorry for late comment. I was supposed to post this review last weekend.

Issues to be fixed:

1) The descriptions in SPEC is in "reStructuredText" format, make it normal text format.
   The other noticeable thing is that the description text start with package name.
   We don't write description like that. Drop the package name and keep rest of the text.

2) Like many other pypi packages, this package also did not add tests and license file in tarball.
   In this case we can think to use github released tarball but upstream has not tagged/released recent tarballs on github.

   Better add license file as separate source as given below in SPEC file.

Source1:        https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alendit/sphinx-pyreverse/master/LICENSE

then at the end of %prep section add
cp -p %{SOURCE1} .

then in %files section add line for this license file as
%license LICENSE

3) Running test in %check also have problem because pypi tarball contains only 1 upstream file from tests directory. This is just note here no action needed for this issue.

4) As per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs guidelines, you need to add your email address in changelog.
   Everytime you make a change in SPEC file, bump the release tag, add a new changelog entry describing what got changed from last release and submit new URLS for further package review.

Forgot this one

5) As per https://github.com/alendit/sphinx-pyreverse/blob/master/setup.py#L34 , change the package license from "GPLv3" to "GPLv3+".

any update here?

This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.