Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1852577
Summary: | "dnf history list" displays an erratic output | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | ruben.lledo.calatayud | ||||||
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | nsella | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
Version: | 32 | CC: | btanastasov, dmach, george.seaton, jmracek, jrohel, kparal, mblaha, mhatina, nsella, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, rpm-software-management, vmukhame | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-4.6.1-1.fc33 dnf-4.6.1-1.fc34 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2021-03-05 19:16:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Created attachment 1699377 [details]
Wrong output
dnf PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1636 test: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/902 *** Bug 1862007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1888216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This is also an issue in RHEL8. Any need to raise a separate bug report? Yes please, it's a different distro, having a separate bug report from a user would be great. (we try not to file the bugs by ourselves because it hides the requester and breaks the feedback loop) These pr address the issue https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1636 https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/902 FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. I can confirm that `sudo dnf history | less` (or head) no longer breaks the output. dnf-4.6.1-1.fc33.noarch Hello. Fixed. Thank you very much. Regards. |
Created attachment 1699376 [details] Expected result Description of problem: "dnf history list" displays an erractic output when piped through any other command, for example, "more" or "head": $ dnf history list | head $ dnf history list | more Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-4.2.23 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Type in a shell: $ dnf history list | head $ dnf history list | more Actual results: (see attached screenshot) Expected results: (see attached screenshot) Additional info: