Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 185847

Summary:	Review Request: deutex - Doom wad manipulator
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Wart <wart>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-03-19 23:07:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	163779

Description Wart 2006-03-19 19:10:15 UTC

Spec Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/deutex.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/deutex-4.4.0-1.src.rpm
Description: 
Doom wad manipulator.  This can be used to extract and replace textures, sounds, sprites, and levels inside of pwads and iwads.  A necessary tool if you want to do anything more than simple level creation.

Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2006-03-19 20:52:33 UTC

I assume this is a cmdline app (and hence the no desktop file)

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2006-03-19 20:59:38 UTC

Answering my own question, yes it is :)

MUST
====
* rpmlint output clean except for:
W: deutex invalid-license GPL-Compatible
W: deutex invalid-license GPL-Compatible
W: deutex-debuginfo invalid-license GPL-Compatible
This is ok essentially deutex is GPL, but some source-files bear a different 
GPL compatible license.
* Package named correctly
* GPL (+compatible) license OK.
* spec file legible, in Am. English
* Source matches upstream
* Successfully compiles and builds on at least one platform (FC-5 x86_64)
* no locale data, shared libraries, or static libraries
* No excessive Requires: or BR:
* Summary and description ok
* macro use consistent
* Does not create any directories
* Not relocatable
* %doc does not affect runtime
* File permissions ok

Approved (now that went smoothly!)

Comment 3 Wart 2006-03-19 23:07:16 UTC

I tried to be more careful about testing the build on other platforms this time.  :)

Imported and built.  Thanks!