Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 186132

Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Radek Vokál <rvokal>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: caolanm
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-30 09:39:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Tomas Mraz 2006-03-21 20:00:46 UTC
Spec Name or Url: 
http://people.redhat.com/tmraz/ooo/openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ.spec
SRPM Name or Url:
http://people.redhat.com/tmraz/ooo/openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ-20060303-1.src.rpm
Description: 
This package contains the czech spellchecker and hyphenation dictionaries for
the Openoffice.org application suite.

Please review. rpmlint gives an error about no binary in usr/lib but I think this can be ignored.

Comment 1 Radek Vokál 2006-03-22 09:57:57 UTC
REVIEW
 * builds fine on FC5
 * installs and works with openoffice.org-writer-2.0.2-5.2.2.i386
 * RPM name is ok
 * there's no binary, just data (mock test skipped)
  - missing binary makes sense

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-22 10:15:41 UTC
err, how about I actually put these czech dictionaries directly into our core
openoffice.org rpm cs_CZ langpack rpm ?

I'll be doing an update for FC5 OOo at some stage, so if you want (and reassign
it to me and OOo component) I can achieve this in the OOo package instead of an
extra rpm ?

Comment 3 Radek Vokál 2006-03-22 11:34:22 UTC
As I understand, shipping cs_CZ dictionaries is not possible inside the langpack
due to licencing problems. 

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-22 11:41:58 UTC
I see, they're GPL while OOo is LGPL. Fair enough.

Comment 5 Radek Vokál 2006-03-27 12:48:59 UTC
ACCEPT

Comment 6 Tomas Mraz 2006-03-30 09:39:01 UTC
Package built for devel, FC-5, FC-4.