Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1869810
Summary: | Please build python-keyring for EPEL 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | python-keyring | Assignee: | Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel8 | CC: | apevec, bperkins, ctubbsii, i, igor.raits, rtnpro |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-keyring-21.3.1-1.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-09-25 16:29:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Scheck
2020-08-18 17:25:15 UTC
(In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #0) > Additional info: > Please let me know if you are not interested in maintaining the package on > EPEL 8 branch. I don't run any EL-based systems, so I wouldn't be able to reliably test EPEL packages. I'm happy to help out with keeping the package up-to-date, if the specfile doesn't diverge much from what's maintained in rawhide, but I'd prefer to add a co-maintainer to help out with it can be tested by somebody who actually uses it. I did `fedpkg request-branch epel8` and got: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27638 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27639 Let me know if you want to be co-maintainer and I can add you in src.fedoraproject.org if you give me your FAS id. I'm not keen on getting a co-maintainer...but if it helps; FAS name: robert FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7e5fbe5e90 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7e5fbe5e90 (In reply to Robert Scheck from comment #3) > I'm not keen on getting a co-maintainer...but if it helps; FAS name: robert I'm happy to do most of the maintenance; I just can't tell if something breaks because I don't have means to do live testing in a RHEL or CentOS 8 workstation. So, I just would feel more comfortable having another person "watch my back", so to speak, with respect to this package's health in EPEL8. I've granted your FAS id privileges. I have produced an initial build. Let me know if it is suitable. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7e5fbe5e90 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7e5fbe5e90 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-7e5fbe5e90 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |