Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 1877811

Summary: Review Request: python-pyarlo - Python library to interact with Netgear Arlo cameras
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fabian Affolter <mail>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Andy Mender <andymenderunix>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: andymenderunix, package-review, zebob.m
Target Milestone: ---Flags: andymenderunix: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-04 00:14:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1878134    
Bug Blocks: 1269538    

Description Fabian Affolter 2020-09-10 13:52:08 UTC
Spec URL:

Project URL:

Python Arlo is a library written in Python that exposes the Netgear
Arlo cameras as Python objects.

Koji scratch build:

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-pyarlo-0.2.2-1.fc32.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-1.fc32.noarch.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Fedora Account System Username: fab

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2020-09-10 20:52:45 UTC
Package is not installable:

DEBUG   Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG    - nothing provides python3.9dist(sseclient-py) needed by python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-1.fc34.noarch

There is a python3dist(sseclient) that you own but no python3dist(sseclient-py). The requirements are clear:


which is and not

Please package it and make sure you BR the right one.

Comment 2 Fabian Affolter 2020-09-11 12:53:31 UTC
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1)
> Package is not installable:
> DEBUG   Problem: conflicting requests
> DEBUG    - nothing provides python3.9dist(sseclient-py) needed
> by python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-1.fc34.noarch
> There is a python3dist(sseclient) that you own but no
> python3dist(sseclient-py). The requirements are clear:
> sseclient-py==1.7
> which is and not
> Please package it and make sure you BR the right one.

Thanks for the hint.

* Fri Sep 11 2020 Fabian Affolter <mail> - 0.2.2-2
- Update BR (rhbz#1877811)

Updated files:
Spec URL:

Comment 3 Andy Mender 2020-09-13 12:58:37 UTC
python-sseclient-py was just approved. I added it to the temporary COPR rollout for Fedora IoT packages:

I'll review this one as well.

Comment 4 Andy Mender 2020-09-13 13:16:29 UTC
Extra COPR build for python-pyarlo:

Package approved.

Package Review

[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
  Note: python3-pytest4 is deprecated, you must not depend on it.

===== MUST items =====

[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 46 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     Review: not needed in this context.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Installation errors
INFO: version 2.5 starting (python version = 3.8.5)...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
INFO: Signal handler active
Start: run
Start: chroot init
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 2.5
INFO: Mock Version: 2.5
Finish: chroot init
INFO: installing package(s): /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-pyarlo/copr-build-1658979/python-pyarlo-doc-0.2.2-2.fc34.noarch.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-pyarlo/copr-build-1658979/python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-2.fc34.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 34 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-pyarlo/copr-build-1658979/python-pyarlo-doc-0.2.2-2.fc34.noarch.rpm /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-pyarlo/copr-build-1658979/python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-2.fc34.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts

Checking: python3-pyarlo-0.2.2-2.fc34.noarch.rpm
python-pyarlo-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C pyarlo documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Source checksums
---------------- :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : b89efd20a07c1e50de83db3cfaab233b568b3afdd527788361590ff5f78b7c1d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b89efd20a07c1e50de83db3cfaab233b568b3afdd527788361590ff5f78b7c1d

python3-pyarlo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

python-pyarlo-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Comment 5 Fabian Affolter 2020-09-14 07:07:56 UTC
Thanks guys for your help.

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-09-14 13:18:56 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-09-29 06:35:27 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-09-30 01:10:03 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:

See also for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-10-04 00:14:48 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5ee9be8291 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.