Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 188429

Summary: Review Request: glib
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Ville Skyttä <scop>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: bugs.michael
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-24 14:34:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 188430    

Description Rex Dieter 2006-04-09 17:36:54 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:
GLib is a handy library of utility functions. This C library is
designed to solve some portability problems and provide other useful
functionality which most programs require.

GLib is used by GDK, GTK+ and many applications.  You should install
th glib package because many of your applications will depend on this

Removed from devel/fc6 Core, intended for (fc6 only) Extras.

* Thu Apr 06 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]> 1:1.2.10-19
- cleanup for Extras
- -devel: Requires: pkgconfig

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2006-04-11 20:05:42 UTC
* rpmlint messages needing action:
  E: glib non-utf8-spec-file glib.spec
  --> use eg. iconv to convert it (from iso-8859-1, I guess)
  W: glib unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/
  --> executable bits missing
* %description (the last sentence) could be updated considering that glib 1.x is
  legacy stuff, "will depend" is a bit bold a statement nowadays :)
* "|| :" at end of %check is superfluous

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2006-04-12 07:36:00 UTC
--- glib.spec.orig      2006-04-09 04:20:56.000000000 +0200
+++ glib.spec   2006-04-12 09:36:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_infodir}
 rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib*.la
-#chmod a+x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.so
+chmod a+x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.so.*

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2006-04-12 11:56:25 UTC
* Wed Apr 12 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]> 1:1.2.10-20
- cleanup %%description
-* missing eXecute bit
- utf-8'ize specfile

I chose to keep the %check ||:, since this is a legacy pkg afterall, and it
certainly doesn't hurt anything.

Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

Comment 4 Ville Skyttä 2006-04-23 18:12:50 UTC
Sorry for the delay, I don't remember seeing bugmails about the progress made
here.  1.2.10-20 looks good, approved.

(Even though glib is legacy stuff, this particular package probably won't ever
enter < FC6, so the "|| :" is indeed very much superfluous...)

Comment 5 Rex Dieter 2006-04-24 14:34:41 UTC
Thanks, imported.