Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1891370
Summary: | Review Request: unrealircd - Open Source IRC server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | losuler, package-review, zebob.m |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | zebob.m:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-18 02:20:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Robert Scheck
2020-10-26 02:27:41 UTC
- Remove this Rpath: [!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Note: See rpmlint output unrealircd.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/unrealircd ['/builddir/unrealircd/lib'] - The program reeds to use Fedora default SSL crypto: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/ unrealircd.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/unrealircd SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list Patch it where necessary: src/tls.c 383: if (SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx, tlsoptions->ciphers) == 0) src/crashreport.c 598: SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx_client, UNREALIRCD_DEFAULT_CIPHERS); src/modulemanager.c 83: SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx_client, UNREALIRCD_DEFAULT_CIPHERS); - Please include this licensese and add a comment explaining the license breakdown: BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License --------------------------------------- unrealircd-5.0.7/include/mempool.h unrealircd-5.0.7/src/mempool.c Expat License ------------- unrealircd-5.0.7/include/openssl_hostname_validation.h - Please add a comment above each patch explaining why they are needed. - Don't mix tabs and spaces, lire 15 there is a tab Source10: unrealircdctl Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Note: See rpmlint output [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU General Public License v1.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later", "Public domain", "GNU General Public License v1.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave), obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Expat License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU General Public License v1.0 or later [generated file, obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU General Public License", "*No copyright* [generated file]", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v1.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later". 143 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/unrealircd/review- unrealircd/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 5 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files. Note: Systemd service file(s) in unrealircd [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: Sources 3, 4 and 10 are not passed to gpgverify. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [ ]: Files in /run, var/run and /var/lock uses tmpfiles.d when appropriate [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: unrealircd-5.0.7-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm unrealircd-debuginfo-5.0.7-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm unrealircd-debugsource-5.0.7-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm unrealircd-5.0.7-1.fc34.src.rpm unrealircd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modularity -> molecularity unrealircd.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/bin/unrealircd SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list unrealircd.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/unrealircd ['/builddir/unrealircd/lib'] unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/pki/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pki/unrealircd 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /etc/pki/unrealircd/curl-ca-bundle.crt ../tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/unrealircd 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/unrealircd/aliases 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/aliases.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/aliases.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/anope.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/anope.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/atheme.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/atheme.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/auspice.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/auspice.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/cygnus.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/cygnus.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/epona.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/epona.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/generic.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/generic.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/genericstats.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/genericstats.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/ircservices.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/ircservices.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/aliases/operstats.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/aliases/operstats.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/badwords.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/badwords.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/dccallow.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/dccallow.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/unrealircd/help 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.de.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.de.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.es.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.es.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.fr.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.fr.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.it.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.it.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.nl.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.nl.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.pl.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.pl.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.ru.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.ru.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/help/help.tr.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/help/help.tr.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/modules.default.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/modules.default.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/modules.optional.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/modules.optional.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/operclass.default.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/operclass.default.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/spamfilter.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/spamfilter.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unrealircd/unrealircd.conf unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unrealircd/unrealircd.conf 640 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /run/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /run/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/unrealircd/LICENSE unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/unrealircd 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/unrealircd 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unrealircd/tmp unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unrealircd/tmp unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/unrealircd/tmp 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/unrealircd unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/unrealircd 750 unrealircd.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/unrealircd'] unrealircd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unrealircd unrealircd.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary unrealircdctl unrealircd.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown unrealircd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US modularity -> molecularity unrealircd.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 15) 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 36 errors, 49 warnings. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1) > unrealircd.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/unrealircd > ['/builddir/unrealircd/lib'] Fixed. > - The program reeds to use Fedora default SSL crypto: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/ Fixed as suggested by bullet #1 by patching the default configuration. > - Please include this licensese and add a comment explaining the license > breakdown: Fixed, but IMHO the "Expat License" is effectively "MIT", especially as the "Expat License" is not mentioned at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main > - Please add a comment above each patch explaining why they are needed. Fixed. > - Don't mix tabs and spaces, lire 15 there is a tab Fixed. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unrealircd.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unrealircd-5.0.7-2.src.rpm Package approved. Thank you for the package review. (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/unrealircd FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 FEDORA-2020-628a83992c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628a83992c FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbd9e24a34 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbd9e24a34 FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ba5f43d4c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ba5f43d4c6 FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbd9e24a34 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbd9e24a34 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-628a83992c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-628a83992c \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-628a83992c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ba5f43d4c6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ba5f43d4c6 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-c0c5de116c has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-e584a6f7d2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-628a83992c has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bbd9e24a34 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ba5f43d4c6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |