Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1900610
Summary: | F34FailsToInstall: funguloids | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Component: | funguloids | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | hdegoede, sergio |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-12-04 14:54:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1868279 |
Description
Miro Hrončok
2020-11-23 12:43:13 UTC
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. This is due to a bump of the ogre versions, unfortunately the new version breaks both abi and api compatibility. I do plan to fix this, but I do not know when I will get around to fixing this, updating status to assigned. Hi, Just last Sunday I realized what you mean, Ogre upgarde will give a bunch of work and it will consume a bunch of time, which I don't have. What you suggest ? Should I rollback ogre to version 1.9 with EPOCH bump ? and about Ogre FTBFS on F33, what we should do ? Hi, (In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #3) > Hi, > Just last Sunday I realized what you mean, Ogre upgarde will give a > bunch of work and it will consume a bunch of time, which I don't have. > What you suggest ? > Should I rollback ogre to version 1.9 with EPOCH bump ? Yes I think a rollback would be best, thanks. And then maybe setup a copr with the latest ogre, so that we can try to move things to that when we find time (if ever), we could then add things to the copr as we port them over; and then once we have everything there move it all over to Fedora proper. > and about Ogre FTBFS on F33, what we should do ? If you build the new epoch bumped 1.9 in rawhide successfully, then you can simply close the FTBFS bug with a resolution of rawhide. That is the normal way to deal with FTBFS bugs which are only fixed after the official release (or during the final freeze). Thanks & Regards, Hans p.s. About the copr thing, that is just something which popped into my mind, it might be an option, but it is not important / is not high priority. Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 34. Thanks for taking care of it! |