Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1905166
Summary: | F34FailsToInstall: florist | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Component: | florist | Assignee: | Pavel Zhukov <pzhukov> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | pzhukov |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-12-13 11:19:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1868279 |
Description
Miro Hrončok
2020-12-07 16:44:04 UTC
This is because gcc has been updated. Who is supposed to do mass-rebuild in case of gcc libraries soname bump? What's the point of mass bugs filling? > Who is supposed to do mass-rebuild in case of gcc libraries soname bump? The GCC maintainer's I'd say. I'll start a thread about this on devel. > What's the point of mass bugs filling? Raising awareness to the issue. (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2) > > Who is supposed to do mass-rebuild in case of gcc libraries soname bump? > > The GCC maintainer's I'd say. I'll start a thread about this on devel. It used to be mass-rebuilds triggered by gcc update in the past. Looks like it's not the case anymore https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchain#Detailed_Description > > > > What's the point of mass bugs filling? > > Raising awareness to the issue. IMO it should be some kind of revdep test in gcc/ci/whatever. Not filling 200+ bugs instead but I don't have full picture here. Yes, the gcc update should have been coordinated wrt the soname bumps. It wasn't :( I am sorry that the automation affected you by many bugzillas, however it's just a symptom of the above. PS Once the packages are rebuilt, the buzilla is also automatically closed. (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5) > Yes, the gcc update should have been coordinated wrt the soname bumps. It > wasn't :( > > I am sorry that the automation affected you by many bugzillas, however it's > just a symptom of the above. > > PS Once the packages are rebuilt, the buzilla is also automatically closed. Well I have to rebootstrap entire stack now. Thank you for heads-up. > Not filling 200+ bugs instead but I don't have full picture here.
BTW It's 17, not 200+.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 34. Thanks for taking care of it! |