Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 1905641

Summary: F34FailsToInstall: awscli
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component: awscliAssignee: David Duncan <davdunc>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: bperkins, davdunc, gwync, jmmahler, me
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-12-08 19:09:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1868279    

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-12-08 18:20:38 UTC

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (awscli) Fails To Install in Fedora 34:

can't install awscli:
  - nothing provides (python3.9dist(colorama) < 0.4.4 with python3.9dist(colorama) >= 0.2.5) needed by awscli-1.18.191-1.fc34.noarch
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (, your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags:


Comment 1 David Duncan 2020-12-08 18:28:20 UTC
Looking into this. I expect that Gwyn Ciesla is already aware that this has occurred.

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-12-08 18:39:10 UTC
I am. I'm looking to see why it doesn't want colorama 0.4.4 and if I can allow it anyway.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-12-08 18:56:02 UTC
Seems Ok, filed upstream, workaround coming to rawhide.

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-12 03:25:34 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days