Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 191304
Summary: | Review Request: crossfire-client - Client programs for the crossfire game | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Wart <wart> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Stone <chris.stone> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-05-17 05:19:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 191305 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Wart
2006-05-10 17:03:10 UTC
* rpmlint output clean * Package named according to Package Naming Guidelines * Spec file matches base package %{name} * Package meets packaging guidelines * License is open source compatible * License matches actual license * License file contained in %doc * Spec file in American English * Spec file is legible * Source file matches upstream 62a9ac007700d1d811fa097fe6790f7a crossfire-client-1.9.0.tar.gz 62a9ac007700d1d811fa097fe6790f7a crossfire-client-1.9.0.tar.gz * Package successfully builds for FC5 x86_64 * All build dependencies listed in Build Requires * Package does not contain locales * Package does not contain any shared libraries * Package is not relocatable * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files in %files * %files contains acceptable %defattr settings * Package contains acceptable %clean section * Macro use is consistant * Package contains permissible code * No large amounts of documentation for a -doc package * Files in %doc do not affect run time of application * No header files or static libraries. or .pc files present * No .so files present * No devel package built * No .la files present * Package include .desktop file - Should probably use %{name}.desktop * Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages *** APPROVED *** Non-Blocking SHOULDS: - Contact upstream about sound problem (I'm assuming you already have done this) - Contact upstream about -images package (Noted that you have done this) - Build -sounds package when sound is working (Probably already on your TODO list) (In reply to comment #1) > Non-Blocking SHOULDS: > - Contact upstream about sound problem (I'm assuming you already have done this) > - Contact upstream about -images package (Noted that you have done this) > - Build -sounds package when sound is working (Probably already on your TODO list) I had originally left sound support in, but upstream told me that it's broken on 2.6 kernels, so I turned it off. It sounds like they plan to use SDL for sound at some unspecified time in the future. I definitely plan on adding support for sound once it works again. Imported and built. Thanks! |