Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1916041
| Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-xmlrpc - XMLRPC is a lightweight protocol that enables remote procedure calls over HTTP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Valena <pvalena> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | František Dvořák <valtri> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gbcox, package-review, valtri, vondruch |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | valtri:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-xmlrpc-0.3.2-1.fc35 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-06-15 12:40:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1914516 | ||
|
Description
Pavel Valena
2021-01-14 01:45:29 UTC
Could you please elaborate why is this needed? We use XMLRPC for Bughunting (not in Fedora yet), but xmlrpc was removed from Ruby. It is also used as dependency in opennebula gem. Taking the review. Issues: ======= - license: it should be probably "Ruby or BSD"? - there has been release 0.3.2 in the meantime (it's good the new dependency on 'webrick' has been recently packaged in Fedora :-)) Notes: ====== - the different version in changelog - but that's probably just due to the workflow with "-1.1" version in COPR? (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4) Firstly, thanks for review! > Issues: > ======= > - license: it should be probably "Ruby or BSD"? Yes, you're right. Same as Ruby. https://github.com/ruby/xmlrpc/blob/master/LICENSE.txt > - there has been release 0.3.2 in the meantime (it's good the new dependency > on 'webrick' has been recently packaged in Fedora :-)) Sure, I'll bump the version. > > > Notes: > ====== > - the different version in changelog - but that's probably just due to the > workflow with "-1.1" version in COPR? Yes, this is a COPR thing, as you can have only one NVR available (new builds+specfiles+srpms with same NVR are removed). This ensures I can have persistent (latest) build available for the URL. It will be removed for the Fedora spec file. _ _ _ _ I've updated the spec file and moved the result here: https://github.com/fedora-distgit/rubygem-xmlrpc/blob/rawhide/rubygem-xmlrpc.spec I've also re-run the builds+tests: https://git.io/J3VmE Thank you. Approved! Has this been pushed to the F34 repo? I don't see it in koji. I believe it is now needed for aria2rpc. Thanks! You're right, I haven't built it yet. I think I can build this for F34 as well. (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-xmlrpc |