Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1928321
Summary: | File conflict with man-pages-de | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
Component: | man-pages-l10n | Assignee: | Nikola Forró <nforro> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 34 | CC: | fedora, jaromir.capik, jrybar, mfabian, mhroncok, nforro, rafaelff, robatino, slrtbtfs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | openqa AcceptedBlocker | ||
Fixed In Version: | man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc34 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-03-23 16:29:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1829024 |
Description
Adam Williamson
2021-02-13 00:52:20 UTC
Marking as an accepted Final blocker per "File conflicts between two packages on a release-blocking DVD-style (offline installer) image without an explicit Conflicts: tag (failures of QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts)" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers . man-pages-de is retired on Fedora 34+. To avoid the conflict, we should obsolete it from fedora-obsolete-packages. But since man-pages-de is retired, how is it pulled to the DVD? Oh! $ repoquery --repo=rawhide --source man-pages-de man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc35.src.rpm If I get it right, the problem was that psmisc was rebased in Fedora 34 while man-pages-l10n wasn't (only in rawhide). I've just built man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc34. Since version 4.9.1, man-pages-l10n no longer contains psmisc's translated man pages. See commit https://salsa.debian.org/manpages-l10n-team/manpages-l10n/-/commit/d54140958bec6c834cc54e1a1b697b2d9df1500a Is this an issue in any version of Fedora? (In reply to Rafael Fontenelle from comment #6) > Since version 4.9.1, man-pages-l10n no longer contains psmisc's translated man pages. See commit https://salsa.debian.org/manpages-l10n-team/manpages-l10n/-/commit/d54140958bec6c834cc54e1a1b697b2d9df1500a > > Is this an issue in any version of Fedora? Yes, that's why I did the rebase from 4.2.0 in Fedora 34. (In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #5) > If I get it right, the problem was that psmisc was rebased in Fedora 34 > while man-pages-l10n wasn't (only in rawhide). I've just built > man-pages-l10n-4.9.2-2.fc34. AFAIK the problem is that new psmisc started to provide its own translated manpages, which started to collide with man-pages-de. Reviewing the rebase now, maybe I should have split the new files in a new i18n subpackage, however that wouldn't resolve the collision problem. (In reply to Jan Rybar from comment #8) > AFAIK the problem is that new psmisc started to provide its own translated > manpages, which started to collide with man-pages-de. Reviewing the rebase > now, maybe I should have split the new files in a new i18n subpackage, > however that wouldn't resolve the collision problem. Yes, but that's why they were removed from man-pages-l10n, and it was rebased. But both rebases should have been coordinated. Repoclosure and fileconflicts tests are both passing currently, so this looks resolved. |