Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1936905
| Summary: | paraview fails to build with Python 3.10: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'paraview' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tomáš Hrnčiar <thrnciar> |
| Component: | paraview | Assignee: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dakingun, mhroncok, orion, scitech-bugs, thrnciar, trpost |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1890881 | ||
This is a mass-posted update. Sorry if it is not 100% accurate to this bugzilla.
The Python 3.10 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag. If you manage to fix the problem, please commit the fix in the rawhide branch, but don't build the package in regular rawhide.
You can either build the package in the side tag, with:
$ fedpkg build --target=f35-python
Or you can the build and we will eventually build it for you.
Note that the rebuild is still in progress, so not all (build) dependencies of this package might be available right away.
Thanks.
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10
If you have general questions about the rebuild, please use this mailing list thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/G47SGOYIQLRDTWGOSLSWERZSSHXDEDH5/
The f35-python side tag has been merged to Rawhide. From now on, build as you would normally build. |
paraview fails to build with Python 3.10.0a6. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.9.0/Utilities/Sphinx/sphinx_apidoc.py", line 447, in <module> main() File "/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.9.0/Utilities/Sphinx/sphinx_apidoc.py", line 411, in main modules = recurse_tree(rootpath, excludes, opts) File "/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.9.0/Utilities/Sphinx/sphinx_apidoc.py", line 307, in recurse_tree create_package_file(root, root_package, subpackage, File "/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.9.0/Utilities/Sphinx/sphinx_apidoc.py", line 212, in create_package_file create_simple_module_files(master_package, py_path, proxy_path, File "/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.9.0/Utilities/Sphinx/sphinx_apidoc.py", line 161, in create_simple_module_files import paraview.simple ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'paraview' For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02053856-paraview/ For all our attempts to build paraview with Python 3.10, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/package/paraview/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.10: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.10 will be included in Fedora 35. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.10. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.