Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1945934
Summary: | Maliit 2.0 released | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Markus S. <kamikazow> |
Component: | maliit-framework | Assignee: | Peter Robinson <pbrobinson> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | aperez, ibiam, jgrulich, pbrobinson |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | maliit-framework-2.0.0-1.fc35 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-06-30 16:00:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1977266 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Markus S.
2021-04-02 18:20:49 UTC
Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? Here is our bug for reference: https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/SIG/issue/90 (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #1) > Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We > need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. Please do a PR and I will review it. > Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update > maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there any crossover between the two? Please also reach out to other users, at least the Sugar desktop uses it as well. (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #1) > > Peter, do you agree that we (KDE SIG) take care of the update process? We > > need maliit keyboard for Plasma Mobile. > > Please do a PR and I will review it. > Will do. > > Plan is to rename maliit-plugins to maliit-keyboard and update > > maliit-framework. Is this okay with you? > > I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there > any crossover between the two? > I assumed maliit-plugins is no longer a thing and instead we have maliit-keyboard, at least I don't see a new release of maliit-plugins, actually it looks the code hasn't been touched for 6 years. Anyway, I will keep it and create a new package for maliit-keyboard if you want to keep maliit-plugins. Here is the first change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 > I assumed maliit-plugins is no longer a thing and instead we have
> maliit-keyboard, at least I don't see a new release of maliit-plugins,
> actually it looks the code hasn't been touched for 6 years. Anyway, I will
> keep it and create a new package for maliit-keyboard if you want to keep
> maliit-plugins.
If it's not supported we don't keep it, my point is that a package rename vs a new package basically is the same thing so just do a new package review.
There are new package requests: 1) qt5-qtfeedback (required for maliit-keyboard) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977266 2) maliit-keyboard - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977283 (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > I don't think it makes much sense to rename plugins -> keyboard, is there > any crossover between the two? The on-screen keyboard plugin was in the "plugins" package before. However, development of all plugins except the keyboard ceased and now only the keyboard is being developed. CC: suger packagers Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is a PR for it: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #9) > CC: suger packagers > > Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is > a PR for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 Yes it's okay to update the maliit-framework, I'll change the library version upstream later. (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #9) > CC: suger packagers > > Is okay for you if we update maliit-framework to the version 2.0.0? Here is > a PR for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/maliit-framework/pull-request/2 Yes it's okay to update the maliit-framework, I'll change the library version upstream later. Thanks. |