Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 196262
| Summary: | Review Request: katapult: Faster access to applications, bookmarks, and other items | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | gauret, rdieter |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-08-21 07:26:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Chitlesh GOORAH
2006-06-22 09:25:43 UTC
404 not found... Sorry, URL fixed though I have a problem with included -devel inside my spec file. from http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult.spec Im having rpmlint -i katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386.rpm W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapult.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultdisplay.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultcatalog.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. So I modified as required http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult_.spec during installation, I fell on root(i386)[0]$rpm -ivh katapult-* error: Failed dependencies: katapult-devel-0.3.1.3 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapult.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapultcatalog.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 libkatapultdisplay.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-1.i386 the katapult package needs %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}catalog.so %{_libdir}/lib%{name}display.so to install but rpmlint wants me to put them in -devel package how can I ask katapult to pull katapult-devel as dependency ? Looks like you may have some version of katapult already installed?
The specfile refers to shared libs
lib*.so.1
but the dependancies speak of
lib*.so.0
Something here is not right.
Other suggestions,
1. drop
Requires(post): desktop-file-utils
Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils
not needed/used.
2. don't package libtool archives either do in %install
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/lib*.la
or
%exclude
them
Updated: Spec URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult.spec SRPM URL: http://beta.glwb.info/katapult/katapult-0.3.1.3-4.src.rpm Looks pretty good, I'll give it a once over... Checks out OK, and for the record: $rpmlint katapult-0.3.1.3-4.fc6.i386.rpm W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapult.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultdisplay.so W: katapult devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libkatapultcatalog.so (harmless, no biggie). APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once the package has been imported into Extras' cvs. Why haven't you imported this package to Extras? I think Chitlesh has been on vacation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation Sorry, yes I was on vacation :) |