Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1968868

Summary:	F35FailsToInstall: pymol
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component:	pymol	Assignee:	Antonio T. sagitter <trpost>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	sergio, thrnciar, trpost
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	pymol-2.4.0-5.fc35	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-06-15 20:42:22 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1902618
Bug Blocks:	1890881, 1927313

Description Miro Hrončok 2021-06-07 23:12:45 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (pymol) Fails To Install in Fedora 35:

can't install pymol:
  - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.9 needed by pymol-2.4.0-4.fc34.x86_64
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-07 23:25:20 UTC

This bugzilla is likely a fallout from the Python 3.10 rebuild.

If your package (or some of the dependencies it has) failed to rebuild during the Python 3.10 rebuild, they now fail to install. To fix this, packages need to be rebuilt in Rawhide.

We will slowly triage the bugzillas, but we'd appreciate your help.

If you know this is blocked by an existing reported build failure or another package not yet rebuilt with Python 3.10, please mark it as such by using the "Depends On"/"Blocks" bugzilla fields. That will help us determine what failures to prioritize.

Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you need any help.

Comment 2 Sergio Basto 2021-06-09 14:26:14 UTC

Builds fails because : 

BuildError: error building package (arch x86_64), mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more information

DEBUG util.py:444:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:444:   Problem: package python3-pyside2-devel-1:5.15.2-3.fc34.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(shiboken2), but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:444:    - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:444:    - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.9 needed by python3-shiboken2-devel-1:5.15.2-3.fc34.x86_64

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-15 00:30:30 UTC

Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 4 Antonio T. sagitter 2021-06-15 10:54:01 UTC

Depend by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902618

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-15 20:58:50 UTC

*** Bug 1972422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***