Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1969500
Summary: | EPEL 8 should not contain the $releasever variable which fails when the "releasever" is set to anything other than 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | jcastran |
Component: | epel-release | Assignee: | Michael Stahnke <mastahnke> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | epel8 | CC: | carl, dennis, extras-orphan, icon, kevin, kwalker, mastahnke, smooge |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
jcastran
2021-06-08 14:15:26 UTC
Moving to the epel-release component: $ rpm -qp https://iad.mirror.rackspace.com/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm --qf "%{SOURCERPM}\n" epel-release-8-10.el8.src.rpm Filed a PR upstream replacing $releasever with 8. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-release/pull-request/14 Yeah, thats the simple fix... but now that we are snapshotting/archiving epel at minor rhel releases, perhaps we should teach mirrormanager about the minor releases? That would let people use the archived versions easier, but also would mean that people on say 8.3 would stay on the archived epel until they upgraded to 8.4 so they may not be aware that they are not getting updates. Should discuss more. Please don't merge the pr yet. (In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #3) > Yeah, thats the simple fix... but now that we are snapshotting/archiving > epel at minor rhel releases, perhaps we should teach mirrormanager about the > minor releases? Interesting! /me Didn't know that was an ongoing discussion. > That would let people use the archived versions easier, but also would mean > that people on say 8.3 would stay on the archived epel until they upgraded > to 8.4 so they may not be aware that they are not getting updates. > > Should discuss more. Please don't merge the pr yet. No worries. I'll consider this notice to hold tight. If there is any further assistance I can offer, feel free to let me know! This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. |