Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1981119 (rust-ed25519)
| Summary: | Review Request: rust-ed25519 - Edwards Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) over Curve25519 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Stuart D Gathman <stuart> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | decathorpe, orion, package-review, stuart |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-11-11 00:45:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2082973 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449, 2121490, 1983745 | ||
|
Description
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
2021-07-11 14:44:31 UTC
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ed25519.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-ed25519-1.1.1-1.fc35.src.rpm I am beginning to package rust. When I built this straight from rust2rpm, I had to build rust-ed25519-dalek first. I need these for bz#1991164 :-) I mean I need bz#1991164 and these for rust-sodiumoxide There has been no movement here - are either of you still interested in this? Ah. I was waiting for rust-ed25519-dalek, but I see it was assigned to me! My fault. Sorry. Looks like you have build these two together. ed25519 is no longer on crates.io. Latest version is 1.5.2 (In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5) > There has been no movement here - are either of you still interested in this? Can I submit a new package review and hope for someone else to review it? The new version has an additional dependency: crate(signature) >= 1.3.1 Oh dear, rust-signature has been orphaned. So now I have to fix #2006269 #2006275 #2006280 Rather than get in over your head (which this is starting to sound like), don't hesitate to ask for help. That will get things done more quickly, and also help you learn more about Rust packaging in a way that doesn't involve banging your head against a wall (too much). eclipseo, are you still interested in packaging this crate? If yes, please update your packaging for the latest available version and continue with the review process. If not, somebody else would likely want to submit a new review request, as this package seems to be blocking multiple other efforts now. New Spec URL: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/rust-ed25519.spec New SRPM URL: https://gathman.org/linux/f37/src/rust-ed25519-1.5.2-2.fc37.src.rpm Post install check has 3 errors: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(pkcs8/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(pkcs8/default) < 0.10.0~) needed by rust-ed25519+pkcs8-devel-1.5.2-2.fc37.noarch Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(pkcs8/alloc) >= 0.9.0 with crate(pkcs8/alloc) < 0.10.0~) needed by rust-ed25519+alloc-devel-1.5.2-2.fc37.noarch Problem 3: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(pkcs8/pem) >= 0.9.0 with crate(pkcs8/pem) < 0.10.0~) needed by rust-ed25519+pem-devel-1.5.2-2.fc37.noarch Marking this review as being blocked by the pending update to pkcs8 v0.9.0. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |