Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 198586

Summary: Review Request: ip6sic - IPv6 Stack Integrity Checker
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jarod Wilson <jarod>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-28 13:13:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Jarod Wilson 2006-07-12 03:35:49 UTC
Spec URL:
ip6sic is a tool for stress testing an IPv6 stack
implementation. It works in a way much similar to isic
which lives at 
It was developed mainly on FreeBSD and is known to work on
OpenBSD and Linux. Theoretically, it should work wherever
libdnet works.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-07-27 04:50:18 UTC
My only concern is the description; I'm not sure it's really relevant to mention
that the source will compile on OpenBSD, or to mention the isic URL when isic is
already in extras.

I'll leave it to you to decide what you want to do.

* source files match upstream:
   b545715256f9c362703754a894fe9093  ip6sic-0.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   ip6sic = 0.1-1.fc6
   libdnet >= 1.1.0
   libpcap >= 0.4
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.


Comment 2 Jarod Wilson 2006-07-27 13:03:46 UTC
The description was basically a simple copy-n-paste off the project page, but
yeah, I suppose we don't really give a rip that it builds on OpenBSD. I'm
importing a -2 revision with a sanitized description. Building for devel as I
type, branching for FC5 requested.

Comment 3 Jarod Wilson 2006-07-28 13:13:23 UTC
Built for FC5, closing ticket.

Comment 4 Christian Iseli 2006-12-31 10:55:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Built for FC5, closing ticket.

Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker.  Thanks.