Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 199016

Summary: Review Request: mxml - Miniature XML development library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Anthony Green <green>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Michael J Knox <michael>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-19 16:30:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 199021    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Updated mxml spec file none

Description Anthony Green 2006-07-15 17:42:49 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml-2.2.2-2.src.rpm
Description: Mini-XML is a small XML parsing library that you can use to read XML
and XML-like data files in your application without requiring large
non-standard libraries.

mxml is required by zynaddsubfx, which I also plan to submit.
This spec file is based on the PlanetCCRMA version.

Comment 1 Anthony Green 2006-07-16 05:18:55 UTC
Created attachment 132521 [details]
Updated mxml spec file

This updated spec file replaces a /usr/lib reference with %{_libdir} for
x86-64.

Comment 2 Michael J Knox 2006-07-19 07:15:07 UTC
Hi. I will do the review for this. 

Review for release 3:

* RPM name is OK
* Source mxml-2.2.2.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* This is the latest version
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint of mxml-devel looks OK
* rpmlint of mxml looks OK
* File list of mxml-devel looks OK
* File list of mxml looks OK
* INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST

Needs work:
* Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
  (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)


Notes:

You need to use %{_datadir} not /usr/share

Fix this up and I can approve this package. 

Comment 3 Anthony Green 2006-07-19 07:24:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi. I will do the review for this. 

Thanks.

> * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST

Testing library...
./testmxml test.xml >temp1.xml 2>temp1s.xml
./testmxml temp1.xml >temp2.xml 2>temp2s.xml
Stdio file test passed!
String test passed!
File descriptor test passed!
 
> Needs work:
> * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros
>   (wiki: QAChecklist item 7)

Fixed.

New bits here:
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~green/FE/FC5/mxml-2.2.2-4.src.rpm


Comment 4 Michael J Knox 2006-07-19 07:38:51 UTC
Cool, looks great. APPROVED. 

Please be sure to close this bug report once inmported into CVS. 

Comment 5 Anthony Green 2006-07-19 16:30:53 UTC
Thanks.