Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1992549

Summary:	F36FailsToInstall: rubygem-dnsruby
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component:	rubygem-dnsruby	Assignee:	Paul Wouters <paul.wouters>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	paul.wouters
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-10-08 17:02:44 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1992487

Description Miro Hrončok 2021-08-11 09:52:13 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (rubygem-dnsruby) Fails To Install in Fedora 36:

can't install rubygem-dnsruby:
  - nothing provides (rubygem(simpleidn) >= 0.1 with rubygem(simpleidn) < 1) needed by rubygem-dnsruby-1.61.7-1.fc35.noarch
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages

Thanks!

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2021-08-22 17:41:57 UTC

Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2021-09-13 09:45:02 UTC

Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 3 Paul Wouters 2021-09-14 01:48:42 UTC

Uhm, this is a little weird. I am sure I put it in "assigned" and left a comment pointing to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000091 about the package haven gotten a new requirement, and that is still waiting on someone to pick up the package review. And I did it for the f35 fails to install bug. Perhaps that one got closed and this one opened instead? 

Please stop the auto-warnings. We just need someone to review the other small package that is required by this package.

Comment 4 Paul Wouters 2021-09-14 02:00:31 UTC

Ah yes, I wrote the above already in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996461

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2021-10-08 17:02:44 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 36.

Thanks for taking care of it!