Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2010608
| Summary: | rpm2flatpak doesn't use custom build of a dependency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Modules | Reporter: | Milan Crha <mcrha> |
| Component: | flatpak-runtime | Assignee: | Kalev Lember <klember> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | klember, mark, otaylor |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-10-13 20:43:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2010597 | ||
|
Description
Milan Crha
2021-10-05 07:59:16 UTC
Hm, if I look at the build logs, it looks like the flatpak container build has indeed picked up the evolution-data-server build from flatpak-common. I guess it's because the evolution-data-server build from flatpak-common happened to have a higher release number: evolution-data-server-3.40.4-1.module_f34+12673+4f71ea37 (flatpak-common) evolution-data-server-3.40.4-1.module_f34+12632+5ae7e8f8 (evolution) A quick fix should be to just drop evolution-data-server from flatpak-common to work this around for now. I'm in the process of rebuilding all flatpaks to be based on F35 flatpak runtime and I can take care of this while doing the rebuilds. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/flatpak-common/c/0dda9f95c335dd390f3af4b78179b176461a5d68?branch=f35 I'll update the ticket once the evolution build is done. > A quick fix should be to just drop evolution-data-server from flatpak-common to work this around for now.
Won't that break the other apps, which expect it being available? I think of the GNOME Calendar and such, but I do not know how they build here.
Yeah, we'll have to add it to the manifest for all the other apps that need it -- I'll take care of it. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2021-c6503004da has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |