Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 202905
Summary: | Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Server-HTTP/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-18 04:10:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 202908 |
Description
Chris Weyl
2006-08-16 23:47:07 UTC
Man, I have to say I really wish the Perl people would take their licensing a bit more seriously. This package says it's released under the same terms as POE. POE says it's released under the same terms as Perl. Love the double indirection. Thanks for the great comment about the POE::API::Peek requirement. The remaining tests seem to run fine in mock and I'd expect them to be OK in the buildsys. * source files match upstream: d20963ebc65bebea4c863813861b9985 POE-Component-Server-HTTP-0.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP) = 0.09 perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Connection) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Response) perl-POE-Component-Server-HTTP = 0.09-1.fc6 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Request) perl(HTTP::Response) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(POE) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Connection) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Request) perl(POE::Component::Server::HTTP::Response) perl(POE::Component::Server::TCP) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(bytes) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=26, 11 wallclock secs ( 0.45 cusr + 0.13 csys = 0.58 CPU) * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. APPROVED +Import to CVS +Add to owners.list +Bump release, build for devel +devel build succeeds +Request branching (FC-5) +Close bug Thanks for the review! :) |