Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 206222 (manaworld-music)

Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Wart <wart>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Christopher Stone <chris.stone>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: panemade
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-23 18:00:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Wart 2006-09-13 01:21:44 UTC
Spec URL:
Upstream's music files for the manaworld game

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-09-13 12:23:21 UTC
{Not Official Reviewer}
packaging looks ok.
+ Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6
+ rpmlint on binary rpm is silent
+ dist tag is present
+ Buildroot is correct
+ source URL is correct
+ BR is correct
+ License used is GPL
+ License file COPYING is included
+ MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball
eec5e7d6c8ddb8938209815dbf5da812  tmwmusic-0.0.20.tar.gz
+ No duplicate files

Not tested package.

Comment 2 Christopher Stone 2006-09-23 16:56:30 UTC
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches package %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package is licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license is included in %doc
- spec file written in American english
- spec file is legible
- package successfully builds on x86_64 FC5
- package does not use locales
- package does not contain shared library files
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- permissions on files set properly
- package contains proper %clean section
- macro usage is consistent
- package contains permissible content
- package does not contain large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries present
- no pkgconfig files present
- no library files with suffix present
- no devel subpackage required
- no .la files present
- not a GUI app needing a .desktop file
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages

Comment 3 Wart 2006-09-23 18:00:21 UTC
Imported and built.