Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 208116
| Summary: | Review Request: oorexx - Open Object Rexx | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jochen Schmitt <jochen> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-10-28 13:25:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||
|
Description
Gérard Milmeister
2006-09-26 15:07:49 UTC
Good: + Rpmlint of source RPM ok. + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint of binaries RPK ok. + Source in RPM matched with upstream. + Local execution of a simple text script works. + Mock build works fine. + Package contains license (CPLv1) in verbatin form. Bad: - rpmlint of install oorexx-libs produced a lot of Warning like: rpmlint oorexx-libs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxDeregisterFunction W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxVariablePool W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librxsock.so.3.0.1 RexxRegisterFunctionDll W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 TheNilObject W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 RexxTerminated W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 ProcessLocalActs W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 _Z12ApiRexxStartlP9_RXSTRINGPcS0_S1_lP10_RXSYSEXITPsS0_ W: oorexx-libs undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librexxapi.so.3.0.1 dlerror ... My version of rpmlint (0.78) doesn't show any warnings or errors at all. However, I found the following: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-September/msg00173.html rpmlint checks undefined non-weak symbols only for installed packages. On https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00830.html I read, that this should not blocked the approvement of the package. So I may APPROVE your package, if you will notify upstream about this problem. I have submitted a bug report to oorexx.sf.net: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1569548&group_id=119701&atid=684730 OK, please import the package into the cvs and make a build. After this please close this bug. Added entries to owners and comps files. Built on FC5 and FC6 for i386 and ppc. Excluded x86_64 for now, since build fails. It requires the 32-bit libc which is not possible in the current mock setup. I will investigate. Does not compile on 64-bit architectures currently. I filed a bug #211008. (In reply to comment #8) > Does not compile on 64-bit architectures currently. > I filed a bug #211008. Oops wrong number, correct one is #212724. |